The History of Tantra

In the New York sector, only Ganesha truly understands the history of Tantra. When Ba’Ba’ visited Taiwan and delivered this talk, Ganesha was beside Him. These photographs were presented to demonstrate the antiquity of Chinese civilization. When we interpret the concept of “civilization,” we do so according to the Chinese understanding, rather than the Western definition or framework. When ancient Chinese thinkers explained “civilization,” they consistently approached it from spiritual and mental dimensions, with little or no emphasis on physical or material perspectives.

Marx was right

A group of people get together in an office, a store, a factory, and by complicated coordination of work, they transform raw material, say a lumber and glue into a finished product. Let's call it a chair. And then they sell that and get the money. And what do they do with the money? They use a portion of the money to replace the lumber and the glue and the hammers and the nails that go into production that have been used up. They use another part of the revenue they get from selling chairs to pay the workers their salaries. And then there's a residue. It's called the profit. Sometimes it's called a surplus. It's what's left over when you've sold the chair, taken care of replacing tools and equipment used up, and paying the workers. It's what it's the part that goes to the capitalist, the owner, the entrepreneur, the person who's running the business. And of course, the people who are running the business have every interest in minimizing what they spend on tools, equipment, and raw material, and minimizing what they pay their workers, because the more they minimize those things, the more they'll maximize what's left over. Which goes to them. And to whom do these people give the leftover profits? Well, of course, they give it mostly to themselves. That's why we have rich people, not-so-rich people, and poor people. If you're a worker, you get a wage. If you're a capitalist, you get your cut of the profit. If businesses run to maximize profits, that's what the economics profession says it should be. Well then, the system is run to benefit the profit earners, not the others. The profit earners of 3% of our people. That's what the US Census Department says the capitalists are. The other 97% are the ones who are not the objects of how this system works. Capitalism makes the capitalist rich, and we all know, as Marx shows us, the results. The capitalists want capitalism to spread. They want to get more and more workers working to produce what is left over for them. They are expanding. They don't care what the cost of expansion is. That's their income. They squeeze the worker every chance they get. Long hours, lousy pay, no breaks, and minimal conditions. You know the story you're already living in. And then the capitalists will become very wealthy by getting the profits and having their whole system focus on maximum profits for them. They understand they're surrounded by a sea of people who are not rich, and they worry about those people's envy and bitterness. So they don't want to let those people have the vote. They fought against it. The workers finally got it. When America began as an independent country, only a minority was allowed to vote. You should know that workers had to fight everywhere. And once work of had the vote, now the capitalists said they're the majority. They're 97%. We're 3. We'd better control the politics. So they went and took their money and bought the politicians. We know all about that. Marx did too, and talked about it. The system is very unstable because these workers, these capitalists, may or may not invest their money. It's their freedom, free enterprise. But if they don't invest their money, there are no jobs for the people who depend on them. This is a system of unfairness built into it. Injustice is built into it. Marx was right about something else. He said this system is built, and has built into it expansion. These capitalists are always trying to get more workers build their in industry. If they can't get more workers, if they can't sell the output that they're making, they'll charge output, a new kind of output. They’ll come up with something else. They'll pay people to invent new things so they can hire people and get the profit. Because the more profit you have, the safer you are. The more politicians you can buy, the more protection you have. So the system grows, Marx pointed out. It will produce a world, the unified economy, it's done that. Just like Marx said. He was right again. But he said the way it's gonna do it is contradictory. It's gonna blow itself up even as it grows. Well, how did capitalism grow globally? The answer: Colonialism. The early capitalist countries, Britain, Western Europe, North America, Japan became domineering countries that had to carve up Asia, Africa, and Latin America to control them. You know, we're seeing it again now with Mr. Trump's new interest in Latin America, making the folks down there tremble. They've been here before. And Marx said eventually this domination, this capitalist use of Asia, Africa, Latin America, simply for the labor you could get there for the raw materials, using them for the wealth of Europe and North America. That's why the world looks the way it does today. Very rich in a few places, very poor in most of the others. We have an inequality in the world that's like what you had in ancient Egypt. Capitalism hasn't freed us from inequality; it's just reorganized an inequality, which Marx said it would. And then he predicted that eventually the colonial territories would say we're not tolerating this anymore. Marx also said that the working class in a capitalist country wouldn't tolerate it anymore either. One of them would make labor unions and fight the battle that way. That's in the advanced countries. Another would make colonial revolutions. You know what shook Asia, Africa and Latin America? Still does. Bitter, horrible fights between a colonial power trying to control and the people who don't want to be controlled. If you need an example today, try Gaza. See how that fits or not. Marx was right about most of these things. He was right that capitalism would be technologically very dynamic. Every capitalist has to worry that he'll be outcompeted by another one as long as there's competition. So to get a jump on the one who's trying to get a jump on him. They'll compete, and they'll develop new technologies, particularly the kind that's save on workers, replacing a lot of workers with your machine. Of course, that's horrible for the workers. But as Carl Marx kept showing, capitalism is not designed for the workers. That's a mythology. It tries to create in the mind of the worker, fearing that if the worker understands what's actually going on, they will be anti-system, anti capitalist too. Which is indeed what Marxists have tried to cultivate for the last 150 years with considerable success. Marx was right about a lot. This is a system, Marx said, that carries within itself the seeds of its own destruction. Might the United States that we're living in. Now, be experiencing through the decline of our empire. The decline of our social solidarity as a nation, the bitter divisions racking the country. The fact that the last half dozen wars that the United States has been involved in, the United States has lost. Are these signs of the seeds of your own self-destruction that Marx pointed to? The goods and services we all depend on to lead our lives. The food, the clothing, the shelter, the transportation, education, medical care, all of it. If you look closely at the production, here's how it works. A group of people get together in an office, a store, a factory, and by complicated coordination of work, they transform raw material, say a lumber and glue into a finished product. Let's call it a chair. And then they sell that and get the money. And what do they do with the money? They use a portion of the money to replace the lumber and the glue and the hammers and the nails that go into production that have been used up. They use another part of the revenue they get from selling chairs to pay the workers their salary. And then there's a residue. It's called the profit. Sometimes it's called a surplus. It's what's leftover when you've sold the chair, taken care of replacing tools and equipment used up, taking care of paying the workers. It's what it's the part that goes to the capitalist, the owner, the entrepreneur, the person who's running the business. And of course, the people who are running the business. Have every interest in minimizing what they spend on tools, equipment, and raw material, and minimizing what they pay their workers, because the more they minimize those things, the more they'll maximize what's leftover. Which goes to them. And to whom do these people give the leftover the profits? Well, of course they give it mostly to themselves. That's why we have rich people and not so rich people and poor people. If you're a worker, you get a wage. If you're a capitalist, you get your cut of the profit. If businesses run to maximize profits, and that's what the economics profession says it should be. Well then the system is run to benefit the profit earners, not the others. The profit earners of 3% of our people. That's what the US Census Department says the capitalists are. The other 97% are the ones who are not the objects of how this system works. Capitalism makes the capitalist rich, and we all know, as Marx shows us, the results. The capitalist want capitalism to spread. They want to get more and more workers working to produce what is leftover for them. They are expansion. They don't care what the cost of expansion is. That's their income. They squeeze the worker every chance they get. Long hours, lousy pay, no breaks, minimal condition. You know the story you're already living in. And then the capitalists will become very wealthy by getting the profits and having their whole system focus on maximum profits for them. They understand they're surrounded by a sea of people that are not rich, and they worry about those people's envy and bitterness. So they don't want to let those people have the vote. They fought against it. The workers finally got it. When America begins as an independent countries, only a minority are allowed to vote. You should know that workers had to fight everywhere. And once work of had the vote, now the capitalist said they're the majority. They're 97%. We're 3. We better control the politics. So they went and took their money and bought the politicians. We know all about that. Marx did too, and talked about it. The system is very unstable because these workers, these capitalists, may or may not invest their money. It's their freedom, free enterprise. But if they don't invest their money, there are no jobs for the people who depend on them. This is a system of unfairness built into it. Injustice built into it. Marx was right about something else. He said this system is built, has built into it expansion. These capitalists are always trying to get more workers build their in industry. If they can't get more workers, if they can't sell the output that they're making, they'll charge output, a new kind of output. They’ll come up with something else. They'll pay people to invent new things so they can hire people and get the profit. Because the more profit you have, the safer you are. The more politicians you can buy, the more protection you have. So the system grows, Marx pointed out. It will produce a world, the unified economy, it's done that. Just like Marx said. He was right again. But he said the way it's gonna do it is contradictory. It's gonna blow itself up even as it grows. Well, how did capitalism grow globally? The answer? Colonialism. The early capitalist countries, Britain, Western Europe, North America, Japan became domineering countries who had to carve up Asia, Africa, Latin America to control them. You know, we're seeing it again now with Mr. Trump's new interest in Latin America, making the folks down there tremble. They've been here before. And Marx said eventually this domination, this capitalist use of Asia, Africa, Latin America, simply for the labor you could get there for the raw materials, using them for the wealth of Europe and North America. That's why the world looks the way it does today. Very rich in a few places, very poor in most of the others. We have an inequality in the world that's like what you had in ancient Egypt. Capitalism hasn't freed us from inequality, it's just reorganized an inequality, which Marx said it would. And then he predicted that eventually the colonial territories would say we're not tolerating this anymore. Marx also said the working class in the capitalist country, they wouldn't tolerate it anymore either. One of them would make labor unions and fight the battle that way. That's in the advanced countries. Another would make colonial revolutions. You know what shook Asia, Africa and Latin America? Still does. Bitter, horrible fights between a colonial power trying to control and the people who don't want to be controlled. If you need an example today, try Gaza. See how that fits or not. Marx was right about most of these things. He was right that capitalism would be technologically very dynamic. Every capitalist has to worry that he'll be outcompeted by another one as long as there's competition. So to get a jump on the one who's trying to get a jump on him. They'll compete and they'll develop new technologies, particularly the kind that's save on workers, replace a lot of workers with your machine. Of course, that's horrible for the workers. But as Carl Marx kept showing, capitalism is not designed for the workers. That's a mythology. It tries to create in the mind of the worker, fearing that if the worker understands what's actually going on, they will be anti system, anti capitalist too. Which is indeed what Marxists have tried to cultivate for the last 150 years with considerable success. Marx was right about a lot. This is a system, Marx said, that carries within itself the seeds of its own destruction. Might the United States that we're living in. Now. Be experiencing through the decline of our empire. The decline of our social solidarity as a nation, the bitter divisions racking the country. The fact that the last half dozen wars that the United States has been involved in, the United States has lost. Are these signs of the seeds of your own self destruction that Marx pointed to?

黎智英

黎智英：（这个人该死在监狱）美国的视频, 他参加一个美国的论坛他怎么说美国应该考虑用和动用和属性攻击中国来保卫香港民主. 这种是人讲的话吗？ 有时候政治斗要有一点界线在，这种话怎么会讲出来？在论坛公开讲，讲的面不改其色，我说难听一点的话，汪精卫也不过如此。我本来对他印象是没有特别好，没有特别坏中性。我不敢相信，我亲耳听到，还在论坛上这样讲，如果视频是别人发的，我还怀疑不是美国媒体发的，是讲英文，他英文也不差。我英文也不差，我听得懂，可以吗？ 我想怎么会有这种人呢！

Racism coup in Prama

Racism coup in Prama led by Visha Mitra and Ramesha.Last year, when I had a conflict with Annitsha, Visha Mitra and Ramesha did not ask me what had happened or inquire into the details. They simply announced my punishment. They said that Ganesha could not attend the HOA meeting. I did not know there was a private courthouse in Ananda Marga. Their behavior made me very furious with them. But what could I do? The only thing I could do was ask them what law they were basing their decision on. Then they realized they had no legal basis to make this kind of decision. From their actions, I could see that they were very used to operating their own “private courthouse.”

Wrong Medhod but they don't know

Regarding the meditation, I FOUND OUT they do it the wrong way here, in America. Either the given instruction is wrong, or they don't follow the instruction correctly, because they don't know the correct point. Here, i give a hint, there are three bodies we have, the physical body, mental body, and spiritual body. You have a sore throat. it is on your physical body. Chakra is in your mental body. Your focusing point is on your mental body, your concentration point is on your physical body. Should I give you more details? Remember samadhii experience is very important. The more and more samadhi, you would know him more and more.

My Spiritual Level

My spiritual level is one with Satya. That's why everyone is drawn to me. All truth eventually comes to light. You cannot hide anything—good or bad, virtuous or evil—it will all be revealed. And you cannot do wrong in my presence. There was a man who was close to me; one day he stole something, and now he is in jail. Any handyman who comes near me will become prosperous immediately. Anyone who cannot get along with me must surely have something evil within them. As a Chinese proverb says: 近朱者赤，近墨者黑 — “Those who stay near vermilion become red; those who stay near ink become black.

国际要闻

12-07-2025 九三阅兵后，福建航母的三弹射，美国都看到，也看到中国在数量上， 是美国没有办法跟中国竞争的。比如说中国的歼二零是主要的战机，歼二零对比的是美国的F22。美国的F22失败停产，美国要用F35来跟歼二零匹配，可是美国的F35一年只能够做35 架，歼二零中国一年可以生产100架，类似的现象，几乎在所有的领域都是如此，这个都太晚，美国现在的军舰一年只能够做九艘军舰。中国大陆在2018年，连续四年，他的造舰量都是世界的总和，是美国的230倍， 第一岛链，美国现在不敢进来，美国现在在后撤，他要从冲绳撤走九千人，然后朝鲜半岛也要撤走四千人。第一岛链跟中国打，美国会输。 中国大陆九三阅兵到福建号航母的三弹射，我认为美国都看到了。美国注意的倒不是中国个别科技的突破，因为这个对美国没什么，他看到的是中国在数量上的增加， 也是日本国没有办法竞争，我举个例子。比如说歼二零是中国的主要的战机。歼二零匹配的是美国的F22。结果美国的F22失败，现在已经停产。F35来跟它匹配，可是美国的F35一年只能够做35架。类似的现象几乎在所有的领域发生。我觉得这个才是美国真正感到忧虑，所以他急着要找韩国协助造船，可是都太晚。美国现在的军舰，一年只能够做九艘军舰。中国大陆在2018，2019，2020，2121连续四年，他的造舰量都是世界的总和。中国大陆的造船的能量是美国的230倍。就这一类，我觉得美国是看到的， 美国也不知道怎么办，美国福特号电磁弹射实际上是美国发明的，那美国本来认为他的错误率大概只有一万分之一，没想到结果是400分之1。把自己都吓坏了。那结果。所以川普最近不是宣布说以后不要做电磁弹射，因为连飞行员都有风险， 主要是量的扩大。那当然中国进入这个时代，我们叫三航母时代。三航母时代的意义就在于中国大陆未来会有一个航母舰队可以摆在日本美国跟台湾的中间， 可以大幅改变区域战略战术。基本上美国要从关岛过来台湾做支援，难度会大增。在经过这些评估之后。美航空母舰已经完全不进入第一岛链。因为风险太高。三个航母时代导致区域拒止，开始真的能够实现。区域拒止就是1996年，台湾第一次的民选总统。结果美国在高雄跟基隆的外海，摆了一艘航母， 双航母，那个时候他通过管道跟中国大陆放话， 你如果真的打台湾。那我一定让你沿海的所有的空军基地全部都被摧毁，这真的事情。后来大陆有人把这件事情写出来，1996年大陆无计可施。1996年大陆把这一日当做国耻日。1996年开始， 就推这个区域拒止，开始真的能够实现以后我就不要让你进来。首先中国大陆是发展出来的东风飞弹的系列，尤其是超高音速导弹，可是这个还不算完全落实，因为这个只是陆基的东风导弹。对美国进来的航母产生威胁，这还不够。一直到航母舰队落实。才真正落实了海上作战，还有空中作战。所以等于是三个领域全部实现。本来是陆基导弹现在加上海战还有空战。当然海战也包括中国的055， 076等等。这个是进入区域拒止，陆海空三军完全实现。而且火箭军可以同时搭载在陆基海基跟空基。确定了美国在台海间不会跟中国大陆发生战争。所以我们就要讲这个日美国自己的分析了，这个是去年十一月美国这个传统基金会的一个报告。2024美国军力指数。这个是美国本来画的图，这第一岛链。美国现在不敢进来，美国现在在后撤。他这次的国防安全战略也有讲到。今年他要从冲绳海战九千人， 本来部署有两万五千人。撤回到关岛， 关岛附近有一个天宁岛， 目前美国花六十亿美金在扩建关岛， 因为要让这些人有地方去。朝鲜半岛也要撤走4000人。而且重型的军事资产，就是飞机中队中队整个撤走。为什么呢？因为第一岛链不能作战，美国会输！ 中国首艘电磁弹射航舰福建舰入列。美国航母的电磁弹射老出毛病，弹射两三次后就故障。