丙午年，有些什么事发生？

有的，道家 和 道教 的英文翻译不同，而且区别很重要，对应的是中国语境中“哲学传统”与“宗教体系”的差别。 一、道家 的英文翻译 ✅ Daoism / Taoism (philosophical Daoism) 最常见、也最规范的译法是： Daoism（拼音式，现代学术界主流） Taoism（威妥玛拼音，旧式但仍常见） 👉 当“道家”指思想流派、哲学传统时，常用： Philosophical Daoism （哲学道家） 使用场景 老子、庄子 《道德经》《庄子》 无为、自然、齐物、反功利 作为哲学、思想体系讨论 📌 示例： Laozi and Zhuangzi are central figures of philosophical Daoism. Daoism emphasizes wu wei (non-action) and harmony with nature. 二、道教 的英文翻译 ✅ Daoism / Taoism (religious Daoism) 道教在英文中仍然用 Daoism / Taoism，但必须加限定语，否则容易混淆： Religious Daoism （宗教道教） 使用场景 张道陵、天师道 道观、道士、符箓、斋醮 内丹、外丹、炼气、神仙体系 宗教组织、仪式与信仰实践 📌 示例： Religious Daoism developed elaborate rituals, priesthoods, and cosmology. Daoist temples are important centers of religious Daoism. 三、为什么英文容易混淆？ 因为英文里只有一个词： Daoism / Taoism 而中文有清晰区分： 道家 → 思想 / 哲学 道教 → 宗教 / 制度 / 修行体系 所以在严肃写作中，英文通常通过 修饰语 来区分。 四、常见但不推荐的译法 ⚠️ 中文 错误 / 不推荐译法 原因 道家 Daoist Philosophy School 不地道 道教 Tao Religion 学术上不用 道家 Lao-Zhuang School 太局限 五、最规范的对照总结表 中文 标准英文 说明 道家 Philosophical Daoism 老庄思想 道教 Religious Daoism 宗教体系 道 Dao (Tao) 核心概念，不翻 道士 Daoist priest 道观 Daoist temple 六、学术语境中的一句“标准说法” Scholars usually distinguish between philosophical Daoism (associated with Laozi and Zhuangzi) and religious Daoism, which developed organized rituals, institutions, and pantheons. 如果你愿意，我也可以： 帮你润色一段英文学术文本，避免道家/道教混淆 或比较 Confucianism / Ruism（儒家） 的类似翻译问题 丙午年，有些什么事发生？ “丙午年”每 60 年一次，所以你这个问题要看指的是哪一个丙午年。历史与民间讨论中，最常被提及的是 1966 年丙午，其次是 1906、1846 等。我按常见理解 + 历史脉络给你一个清晰说明。 一、最常被问的：1966 年（丙午年，火马年） 这是现代中国语境里影响最大、讨论最多的丙午年。 1️⃣ 重大历史事件 文化大革命正式开始（1966–1976） 5 月《五一六通知》 红卫兵运动兴起 教育、文化、政治体系剧烈震荡 中国社会结构发生深层断裂 知识分子、传统文化遭到系统性冲击 👉 在历史研究中，1966 丙午年常被视为一个时代的断裂点。 2️⃣ 民间说法：「丙午火马年，不吉」 这是民俗层面，不是科学结论，但影响非常大。 常见说法包括： “火马年多灾多难” “丙午年出生者命硬、克父母” 因此 1966 年出生率明显下降 📌 这个现象在人口统计学上是真实存在的，但原因是： 社会动荡 民俗恐惧 政策与现实压力 而不是“天命”。 3️⃣ 命理象征（文化解释层面） 丙：阳火 午：火 丙午 = 火上加火 在传统象征体系中： 火 → 变动、激烈、破坏、更新 因而被后人事后解释为“应验” ⚠️ 但要强调： 这是文化解释，不是历史因果。 二、其他重要的丙午年 🔹 1906 年（丙午） 清末危机加深 列强势力扩张 革命思潮高涨（距辛亥革命仅 5 年） 铁路、工业、学生运动开始活跃 👉 常被视为旧帝国崩溃前的加速期 🔹 1846 年（丙午） 清道光年间 社会矛盾严重 鸦片问题加剧 为之后的**太平天国运动（1851）**埋下伏笔 三、为什么“丙午年”总被记住？ 不是因为“天干地支有魔力”，而是： 历史选择性记忆 大事件发生后，人们会回头寻找“象征” 丙午 = 火极 → 容易被用来解释“剧烈变化” 一句话总结： 不是丙午年导致动乱，而是动乱发生后，人们记住了丙午年。 四、一句话总结 丙午年 = 每 60 年一次 1966 年丙午：文化大革命开始，影响极深 “火马年不吉”是民俗心理 + 历史创伤的叠加 从学术角度看： 👉 社会结构决定事件，纪年只是标签 如果你愿意，我也可以： 从 道家 / 易学 / 历史社会学三个角度分别解释丙午 或专门分析 1966 丙午为何成为“集体记忆中的禁忌年”

The History of Tantra

In the New York sector, only Ganesha truly understands the history of Tantra. When Ba’Ba’ visited Taiwan and delivered this talk, Ganesha was beside Him. These photographs were presented to demonstrate the antiquity of Chinese civilization. When we interpret the concept of “civilization,” we do so according to the Chinese understanding, rather than the Western definition or framework. When ancient Chinese thinkers explained “civilization,” they consistently approached it from spiritual and mental dimensions, with little or no emphasis on physical or material perspectives.

Marx was right

A group of people get together in an office, a store, a factory, and by complicated coordination of work, they transform raw material, say a lumber and glue into a finished product. Let's call it a chair. And then they sell that and get the money. And what do they do with the money? They use a portion of the money to replace the lumber and the glue and the hammers and the nails that go into production that have been used up. They use another part of the revenue they get from selling chairs to pay the workers their salaries. And then there's a residue. It's called the profit. Sometimes it's called a surplus. It's what's left over when you've sold the chair, taken care of replacing tools and equipment used up, and paying the workers. It's what it's the part that goes to the capitalist, the owner, the entrepreneur, the person who's running the business. And of course, the people who are running the business have every interest in minimizing what they spend on tools, equipment, and raw material, and minimizing what they pay their workers, because the more they minimize those things, the more they'll maximize what's left over. Which goes to them. And to whom do these people give the leftover profits? Well, of course, they give it mostly to themselves. That's why we have rich people, not-so-rich people, and poor people. If you're a worker, you get a wage. If you're a capitalist, you get your cut of the profit. If businesses run to maximize profits, that's what the economics profession says it should be. Well then, the system is run to benefit the profit earners, not the others. The profit earners of 3% of our people. That's what the US Census Department says the capitalists are. The other 97% are the ones who are not the objects of how this system works. Capitalism makes the capitalist rich, and we all know, as Marx shows us, the results. The capitalists want capitalism to spread. They want to get more and more workers working to produce what is left over for them. They are expanding. They don't care what the cost of expansion is. That's their income. They squeeze the worker every chance they get. Long hours, lousy pay, no breaks, and minimal conditions. You know the story you're already living in. And then the capitalists will become very wealthy by getting the profits and having their whole system focus on maximum profits for them. They understand they're surrounded by a sea of people who are not rich, and they worry about those people's envy and bitterness. So they don't want to let those people have the vote. They fought against it. The workers finally got it. When America began as an independent country, only a minority was allowed to vote. You should know that workers had to fight everywhere. And once work of had the vote, now the capitalists said they're the majority. They're 97%. We're 3. We'd better control the politics. So they went and took their money and bought the politicians. We know all about that. Marx did too, and talked about it. The system is very unstable because these workers, these capitalists, may or may not invest their money. It's their freedom, free enterprise. But if they don't invest their money, there are no jobs for the people who depend on them. This is a system of unfairness built into it. Injustice is built into it. Marx was right about something else. He said this system is built, and has built into it expansion. These capitalists are always trying to get more workers build their in industry. If they can't get more workers, if they can't sell the output that they're making, they'll charge output, a new kind of output. They’ll come up with something else. They'll pay people to invent new things so they can hire people and get the profit. Because the more profit you have, the safer you are. The more politicians you can buy, the more protection you have. So the system grows, Marx pointed out. It will produce a world, the unified economy, it's done that. Just like Marx said. He was right again. But he said the way it's gonna do it is contradictory. It's gonna blow itself up even as it grows. Well, how did capitalism grow globally? The answer: Colonialism. The early capitalist countries, Britain, Western Europe, North America, Japan became domineering countries that had to carve up Asia, Africa, and Latin America to control them. You know, we're seeing it again now with Mr. Trump's new interest in Latin America, making the folks down there tremble. They've been here before. And Marx said eventually this domination, this capitalist use of Asia, Africa, Latin America, simply for the labor you could get there for the raw materials, using them for the wealth of Europe and North America. That's why the world looks the way it does today. Very rich in a few places, very poor in most of the others. We have an inequality in the world that's like what you had in ancient Egypt. Capitalism hasn't freed us from inequality; it's just reorganized an inequality, which Marx said it would. And then he predicted that eventually the colonial territories would say we're not tolerating this anymore. Marx also said that the working class in a capitalist country wouldn't tolerate it anymore either. One of them would make labor unions and fight the battle that way. That's in the advanced countries. Another would make colonial revolutions. You know what shook Asia, Africa and Latin America? Still does. Bitter, horrible fights between a colonial power trying to control and the people who don't want to be controlled. If you need an example today, try Gaza. See how that fits or not. Marx was right about most of these things. He was right that capitalism would be technologically very dynamic. Every capitalist has to worry that he'll be outcompeted by another one as long as there's competition. So to get a jump on the one who's trying to get a jump on him. They'll compete, and they'll develop new technologies, particularly the kind that's save on workers, replacing a lot of workers with your machine. Of course, that's horrible for the workers. But as Carl Marx kept showing, capitalism is not designed for the workers. That's a mythology. It tries to create in the mind of the worker, fearing that if the worker understands what's actually going on, they will be anti-system, anti capitalist too. Which is indeed what Marxists have tried to cultivate for the last 150 years with considerable success. Marx was right about a lot. This is a system, Marx said, that carries within itself the seeds of its own destruction. Might the United States that we're living in. Now, be experiencing through the decline of our empire. The decline of our social solidarity as a nation, the bitter divisions racking the country. The fact that the last half dozen wars that the United States has been involved in, the United States has lost. Are these signs of the seeds of your own self-destruction that Marx pointed to? The goods and services we all depend on to lead our lives. The food, the clothing, the shelter, the transportation, education, medical care, all of it. If you look closely at the production, here's how it works. A group of people get together in an office, a store, a factory, and by complicated coordination of work, they transform raw material, say a lumber and glue into a finished product. Let's call it a chair. And then they sell that and get the money. And what do they do with the money? They use a portion of the money to replace the lumber and the glue and the hammers and the nails that go into production that have been used up. They use another part of the revenue they get from selling chairs to pay the workers their salary. And then there's a residue. It's called the profit. Sometimes it's called a surplus. It's what's leftover when you've sold the chair, taken care of replacing tools and equipment used up, taking care of paying the workers. It's what it's the part that goes to the capitalist, the owner, the entrepreneur, the person who's running the business. And of course, the people who are running the business. Have every interest in minimizing what they spend on tools, equipment, and raw material, and minimizing what they pay their workers, because the more they minimize those things, the more they'll maximize what's leftover. Which goes to them. And to whom do these people give the leftover the profits? Well, of course they give it mostly to themselves. That's why we have rich people and not so rich people and poor people. If you're a worker, you get a wage. If you're a capitalist, you get your cut of the profit. If businesses run to maximize profits, and that's what the economics profession says it should be. Well then the system is run to benefit the profit earners, not the others. The profit earners of 3% of our people. That's what the US Census Department says the capitalists are. The other 97% are the ones who are not the objects of how this system works. Capitalism makes the capitalist rich, and we all know, as Marx shows us, the results. The capitalist want capitalism to spread. They want to get more and more workers working to produce what is leftover for them. They are expansion. They don't care what the cost of expansion is. That's their income. They squeeze the worker every chance they get. Long hours, lousy pay, no breaks, minimal condition. You know the story you're already living in. And then the capitalists will become very wealthy by getting the profits and having their whole system focus on maximum profits for them. They understand they're surrounded by a sea of people that are not rich, and they worry about those people's envy and bitterness. So they don't want to let those people have the vote. They fought against it. The workers finally got it. When America begins as an independent countries, only a minority are allowed to vote. You should know that workers had to fight everywhere. And once work of had the vote, now the capitalist said they're the majority. They're 97%. We're 3. We better control the politics. So they went and took their money and bought the politicians. We know all about that. Marx did too, and talked about it. The system is very unstable because these workers, these capitalists, may or may not invest their money. It's their freedom, free enterprise. But if they don't invest their money, there are no jobs for the people who depend on them. This is a system of unfairness built into it. Injustice built into it. Marx was right about something else. He said this system is built, has built into it expansion. These capitalists are always trying to get more workers build their in industry. If they can't get more workers, if they can't sell the output that they're making, they'll charge output, a new kind of output. They’ll come up with something else. They'll pay people to invent new things so they can hire people and get the profit. Because the more profit you have, the safer you are. The more politicians you can buy, the more protection you have. So the system grows, Marx pointed out. It will produce a world, the unified economy, it's done that. Just like Marx said. He was right again. But he said the way it's gonna do it is contradictory. It's gonna blow itself up even as it grows. Well, how did capitalism grow globally? The answer? Colonialism. The early capitalist countries, Britain, Western Europe, North America, Japan became domineering countries who had to carve up Asia, Africa, Latin America to control them. You know, we're seeing it again now with Mr. Trump's new interest in Latin America, making the folks down there tremble. They've been here before. And Marx said eventually this domination, this capitalist use of Asia, Africa, Latin America, simply for the labor you could get there for the raw materials, using them for the wealth of Europe and North America. That's why the world looks the way it does today. Very rich in a few places, very poor in most of the others. We have an inequality in the world that's like what you had in ancient Egypt. Capitalism hasn't freed us from inequality, it's just reorganized an inequality, which Marx said it would. And then he predicted that eventually the colonial territories would say we're not tolerating this anymore. Marx also said the working class in the capitalist country, they wouldn't tolerate it anymore either. One of them would make labor unions and fight the battle that way. That's in the advanced countries. Another would make colonial revolutions. You know what shook Asia, Africa and Latin America? Still does. Bitter, horrible fights between a colonial power trying to control and the people who don't want to be controlled. If you need an example today, try Gaza. See how that fits or not. Marx was right about most of these things. He was right that capitalism would be technologically very dynamic. Every capitalist has to worry that he'll be outcompeted by another one as long as there's competition. So to get a jump on the one who's trying to get a jump on him. They'll compete and they'll develop new technologies, particularly the kind that's save on workers, replace a lot of workers with your machine. Of course, that's horrible for the workers. But as Carl Marx kept showing, capitalism is not designed for the workers. That's a mythology. It tries to create in the mind of the worker, fearing that if the worker understands what's actually going on, they will be anti system, anti capitalist too. Which is indeed what Marxists have tried to cultivate for the last 150 years with considerable success. Marx was right about a lot. This is a system, Marx said, that carries within itself the seeds of its own destruction. Might the United States that we're living in. Now. Be experiencing through the decline of our empire. The decline of our social solidarity as a nation, the bitter divisions racking the country. The fact that the last half dozen wars that the United States has been involved in, the United States has lost. Are these signs of the seeds of your own self destruction that Marx pointed to?

黎智英

黎智英：（这个人该死在监狱）美国的视频, 他参加一个美国的论坛他怎么说美国应该考虑用和动用和属性攻击中国来保卫香港民主. 这种是人讲的话吗？ 有时候政治斗要有一点界线在，这种话怎么会讲出来？在论坛公开讲，讲的面不改其色，我说难听一点的话，汪精卫也不过如此。我本来对他印象是没有特别好，没有特别坏中性。我不敢相信，我亲耳听到，还在论坛上这样讲，如果视频是别人发的，我还怀疑不是美国媒体发的，是讲英文，他英文也不差。我英文也不差，我听得懂，可以吗？ 我想怎么会有这种人呢！

Racism coup in Prama

Racism coup in Prama led by Visha Mitra and Ramesha.Last year, when I had a conflict with Annitsha, Visha Mitra and Ramesha did not ask me what had happened or inquire into the details. They simply announced my punishment. They said that Ganesha could not attend the HOA meeting. I did not know there was a private courthouse in Ananda Marga. Their behavior made me very furious with them. But what could I do? The only thing I could do was ask them what law they were basing their decision on. Then they realized they had no legal basis to make this kind of decision. From their actions, I could see that they were very used to operating their own “private courthouse.”

Wrong Medhod but they don't know

Regarding the meditation, I FOUND OUT they do it the wrong way here, in America. Either the given instruction is wrong, or they don't follow the instruction correctly, because they don't know the correct point. Here, i give a hint, there are three bodies we have, the physical body, mental body, and spiritual body. You have a sore throat. it is on your physical body. Chakra is in your mental body. Your focusing point is on your mental body, your concentration point is on your physical body. Should I give you more details? Remember samadhii experience is very important. The more and more samadhi, you would know him more and more.

My Spiritual Level

My spiritual level is one with Satya. That's why everyone is drawn to me. All truth eventually comes to light. You cannot hide anything—good or bad, virtuous or evil—it will all be revealed. And you cannot do wrong in my presence. There was a man who was close to me; one day he stole something, and now he is in jail. Any handyman who comes near me will become prosperous immediately. Anyone who cannot get along with me must surely have something evil within them. As a Chinese proverb says: 近朱者赤，近墨者黑 — “Those who stay near vermilion become red; those who stay near ink become black.

国际要闻

12-07-2025 九三阅兵后，福建航母的三弹射，美国都看到，也看到中国在数量上， 是美国没有办法跟中国竞争的。比如说中国的歼二零是主要的战机，歼二零对比的是美国的F22。美国的F22失败停产，美国要用F35来跟歼二零匹配，可是美国的F35一年只能够做35 架，歼二零中国一年可以生产100架，类似的现象，几乎在所有的领域都是如此，这个都太晚，美国现在的军舰一年只能够做九艘军舰。中国大陆在2018年，连续四年，他的造舰量都是世界的总和，是美国的230倍， 第一岛链，美国现在不敢进来，美国现在在后撤，他要从冲绳撤走九千人，然后朝鲜半岛也要撤走四千人。第一岛链跟中国打，美国会输。 中国大陆九三阅兵到福建号航母的三弹射，我认为美国都看到了。美国注意的倒不是中国个别科技的突破，因为这个对美国没什么，他看到的是中国在数量上的增加， 也是日本国没有办法竞争，我举个例子。比如说歼二零是中国的主要的战机。歼二零匹配的是美国的F22。结果美国的F22失败，现在已经停产。F35来跟它匹配，可是美国的F35一年只能够做35架。类似的现象几乎在所有的领域发生。我觉得这个才是美国真正感到忧虑，所以他急着要找韩国协助造船，可是都太晚。美国现在的军舰，一年只能够做九艘军舰。中国大陆在2018，2019，2020，2121连续四年，他的造舰量都是世界的总和。中国大陆的造船的能量是美国的230倍。就这一类，我觉得美国是看到的， 美国也不知道怎么办，美国福特号电磁弹射实际上是美国发明的，那美国本来认为他的错误率大概只有一万分之一，没想到结果是400分之1。把自己都吓坏了。那结果。所以川普最近不是宣布说以后不要做电磁弹射，因为连飞行员都有风险， 主要是量的扩大。那当然中国进入这个时代，我们叫三航母时代。三航母时代的意义就在于中国大陆未来会有一个航母舰队可以摆在日本美国跟台湾的中间， 可以大幅改变区域战略战术。基本上美国要从关岛过来台湾做支援，难度会大增。在经过这些评估之后。美航空母舰已经完全不进入第一岛链。因为风险太高。三个航母时代导致区域拒止，开始真的能够实现。区域拒止就是1996年，台湾第一次的民选总统。结果美国在高雄跟基隆的外海，摆了一艘航母， 双航母，那个时候他通过管道跟中国大陆放话， 你如果真的打台湾。那我一定让你沿海的所有的空军基地全部都被摧毁，这真的事情。后来大陆有人把这件事情写出来，1996年大陆无计可施。1996年大陆把这一日当做国耻日。1996年开始， 就推这个区域拒止，开始真的能够实现以后我就不要让你进来。首先中国大陆是发展出来的东风飞弹的系列，尤其是超高音速导弹，可是这个还不算完全落实，因为这个只是陆基的东风导弹。对美国进来的航母产生威胁，这还不够。一直到航母舰队落实。才真正落实了海上作战，还有空中作战。所以等于是三个领域全部实现。本来是陆基导弹现在加上海战还有空战。当然海战也包括中国的055， 076等等。这个是进入区域拒止，陆海空三军完全实现。而且火箭军可以同时搭载在陆基海基跟空基。确定了美国在台海间不会跟中国大陆发生战争。所以我们就要讲这个日美国自己的分析了，这个是去年十一月美国这个传统基金会的一个报告。2024美国军力指数。这个是美国本来画的图，这第一岛链。美国现在不敢进来，美国现在在后撤。他这次的国防安全战略也有讲到。今年他要从冲绳海战九千人， 本来部署有两万五千人。撤回到关岛， 关岛附近有一个天宁岛， 目前美国花六十亿美金在扩建关岛， 因为要让这些人有地方去。朝鲜半岛也要撤走4000人。而且重型的军事资产，就是飞机中队中队整个撤走。为什么呢？因为第一岛链不能作战，美国会输！ 中国首艘电磁弹射航舰福建舰入列。美国航母的电磁弹射老出毛病，弹射两三次后就故障。

Achievement of all your lessons you have learned from Ananda Marga

Achievement of all your lessons you have learned from Ananda Marga Do you know the achievement of your first lesson? Do you know the achievement of your second lesson? Do you know the achievements of all the lessons you learn from Ananada Marga? No, anyway, you should know. It may help you or encourage you to arrive at your final goal. Later, I’ll introduce and open up the answer to you.

prama village

美国白人Margii 在prama village 里有很多这种人,就是喜欢在上帝面前玩弄自己的小聪明。我最瞧不起的就是这种人。所以看得到美国白人Margii他们的灵修绝对不会有成就。

What's wrong with the Katuah HOA?

Last year, at the last meeting, this case was still pending. Why? You know why. There’s no need for me to explain. I know Hirayamaya favors Anisha and Tusiita because they help him a lot. Hirayamaya wants to fool everyone and delay this case as long as he can. This kind of behavior is not acceptable. How can they keep dragging it out like this? Law is law. Everyone should follow the law. Since they violated the shared driveway rules, they must correct it. They can use our shared driveway, but they should also keep their own easement driveway for their own use. And here’s the funny part of this case: I didn’t violate the law, yet I’m the one who gets complaints from members such as Anuvin and Chinmayi. Anuvin asked me, “Why can’t you be broad-minded?” Chinmayi said, “Did parking my car here cause you any inconvenience?” And so on with other complaints. Meanwhile, Anisha and Tusiita are treated like saints—no one complains about them. It makes it look as if they’re right. You members of HOA have no sense of right and wrong. How many years has this been going on? When will the HOA finally act and make them correct their violation? See the pictures anisha and tusiita put bushes on the shared Driveway, and put a fence around it. More, they put pallet to protect anyone use this easement of the shared driveway I want to be a worker on board as a bookkeeper and advisor for the KATUAH HOA. I have more than 30 years of experience as a realtor. We owned 11 houses and had experiences with so many HOA. Before I had 3 attorneys working for me from different areas. I had experience going to court suing Bank of America, bad attorneys, and many renters, working with many handymen, and repaired so many houses. if you think I’m qualified to be, then chose me to work for you on board. Should I tell you how long this issue has lasted? More than five years. You have delayed it for over five years. You must be very happy playing your game this way. Congratulations to you! At least I have lived my whole life with a clear conscience. I said you favor Anisha and Tusiita. Am I wrong, as old and as wise as I am? You must be joking with me. You have your way of doing things, and I have mine.

September the 3rd, 2025

the Chinese nation is a great nation that does not fear violence and that stands independent and strong. Victory Day parade in Beijing, where China is flexing its military muscle. 北京的胜利日阅兵式，中国正在展示其军事力量。You may have seen that China had a massive military parade today, the first of its kind in 5 years. And what was the occasion? The 80th anniversary of China's victory over Japan in World War Two. That's how they put it. So kicking out the spectacle was an 80-gun salute. This was China's largest ever military parade, the largest in its history. It was attended by 50,000 people, not to. Long list of foreign dignitaries. There are more than 25 heads of state, including Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. 这是中国对二战抗日胜利 80 周年的表述。揭开庆典序幕的是 80 响礼炮。这是中国史上规模最大的阅兵式，也是历史上最大的一次。共有 5 万人参加，同时还有长长的外国政要名单。包括俄罗斯总统弗拉基米尔·普京和朝鲜领导人金正恩在内，出席的外国元首超过 25 位。These 2 are the guests of the owners, Putin and Kim. They planned for Chinese President Shi Jinping at the parade. The event was replete with symbolism, starting from Xi Jinping's attire, who wore a Mao suit today, a suit similar to what Mao Zedong used to wear. Clearly an attempt to channel Mao, the father of modern China. And that too on a day like this when Xi has outdone Mao. Xi Jinping has held more military parades than Mao Je Dong. Even in the Mao era, China held massive had a massive military in terms of troop numbers; they were quite big, but their weapons were primitive. Today, Xi Jinping showcased a different PLA. That's what they call their military, the PLA, the People's Liberation Army. Today, they showcased a modern fighting force. Although this force is still not battle-tested, the scale was staggering: 10,000 troops marched in Tiananmen Square. There were more than 100 aircraft and hundreds of other weapon systems. This includes conventional weaponry and advanced tech from air defense lasers to stealth fighter jets, anti-ship missiles, and undersea drones. Like I said, most of it is not battle-tested so take China's claims with a pinch of salt. 就像我说的，大部分还没有经过实战检验，所以对中国的说法要持保留态度。They even showcase robot dogs. That's right, Beijing's new soldiers are robot dogs. So China flexed serious military muscle today. But what was their real objective? What were they trying to do? They were trying to send a message to rivals and partners alike. For Xi Jinping, this was a chance to show progress to highlight the rapid modernization of China's armed forces. The PLA now claims to have hypersonic missiles, unmanned aerial systems, counter-drone weapons, and cyber and electronic warfare tools. 无人作战系统、反无人机武器，以及网络和电子战工具。 And they say all of it has been built at home. All of it is made in China. The idea is to signal that the PLA can wage war across all domains, land, sea, air, cyber, and space. The Chinese nation is a great nation that is not fear violence, so that stands independent and strong. In the past, when confronted with a life or death struggle between justice and evil, light and darkness, progress and reaction, the Chinese people stood united, rose up and resistance, and fought for the survival of the country, the rejuvenation of the nation. 过去，当面临正义与邪恶、光明与黑暗、进步与反动之间的生死较量时，中国人民团结一致，奋起抵抗，为国家的生存、民族的复兴而战。And the cause of human justice. Today, humanity once again faces a choice between peace and war, dialogue and confrontation, mutual benefit and zero-sum competition. The Chinese people firmly stand on the right side of history. 人类再次面临在和平与战争、对话与对抗、互利共赢与零和竞争之间的抉择。中国人民坚定地站在历史正确的一边。 But the US and its allies, Beijing had a political message too. Xi Jinping was flanked by Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un, 位置/方位：在……的两侧、位于旁边 • Xi Jinping was flanked by Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un. 习近平身旁站着普京和金正恩。 and their presence was no coincidence. It was a declaration of intent. China is shaping in an anti-Western alliance and the guest list underlying this intent. 北京方面也有自己的政治信号。习近平身旁站着弗拉基米尔·普京和金正恩，他们的出现绝非巧合，而是一种意图的宣示。中国正在塑造一个反西方的联盟，而宾客名单正凸显了这一意图。 Look at the attendees Belarus President Lukashenko, Iran's President Masood Pessia, Cubas Miguel Diaz Canel, and Myanmar's military chief Min Aung Lang. They were all there for the parade in Beijing, all united by one purpose, an opposition to the West and by extension an alignment with China. The West wants to isolate these countries. Instead, they have come together and formed a coalition, 他们已经走到一起，组成了一个联盟。one that China is happy to back. And the message was delivered to the intended recipient, U.S. President Donald Trump. As the images from Beijing came in, Trump launched a fresh attack on Xi. He said China is conspiring against the US along with Russia, North Korea. Trump wrote a message for Xi on Truth Social. This is what he said. Please give my warmest regards to Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un as you conspire against the United States of America. This is America's response to China's parade, a presidential rant. Meanwhile, the US Congress is pushing sanctions on some Chinese officials. This is over the fentanyl crisis. The House of Representatives, which is their lower House of the American parliament, has passed this bill. Plus, President Trump is targeting TSMC, that's Taiwan chip-making giant TSMC. It has factories in both China and Taiwan, and it uses technology and tools built in the US. So now the Trump administration is trying to block it, so that US chip-making tools do not reach TSMC plants in China. And to do this, they have revoked TSMC license. It's the same old weapon of economic sanctions. Although it's proving to be a blunt tool. Take the example of Russia. Russia has more than 20,000 Western sanctions. Trump gave Putin an ultimatum last month. Stop the war in Ukraine in 50 days or face the consequences. Well, that's 50-day deadline has passed today. And the war in Ukraine is still on. Trump's ultimatum has not even slowed it down. And today, the leaders of Russia, China, and North Korea, along with many others, are not just struggling with American sanctions and threats. They are marching together.

EX is evil

Ex-members should not get involved in any Ananda Marga work. They can only come to the DC, but not engage in any other organizational activities. Their involvement in the organization would make its appearance look very bad. This is how it seems. If those ex-members understand the dilemma and Baba’s teachings, they should not work in the organization or get involved in any organizational activities.

workers can not close to me

I found out because I am so satyam, all those immoral workers, handymen, etc, can not work for me. I believe those people who work for the FBI or CIA, they people not even can not come close to me.

One Version about kundalini

Do you know the difference between kundalini and prana? When kundalini rises up from the spine, do you know whether it is kundalini or prana? When prana rises up from the spine, do you know whether it is prana or kundalini? When the current of energy rises, does it come from the back of the spine, the front of the spine, or the middle of the spine? Can you tell? You are a senior—it doesn’t matter whether you are a margii or a worker. You have been practicing meditation for over 30 or 40 years. You should be able to tell the difference. Why can’t you? That’s why you are still at the beginner’s level of spiritual practice. What kind of energy is kundalini? What kind of energy is prana? How should they be used? When should they be used? Do you know what Ba’Ba’ said? Do you truly understand English? If you did, you should be at a much higher level. Yesterday, a new margii said that when he sat in the car, something was rising up through his spine. Our senior margii immediately said it was kundalini. But how do you know it was kundalini and not prana? Maybe you don’t even know that prana can also rise up through the spine. This shows the level of understanding among our senior margiis and workers: knowing nothing yet daring to speak as if they do.

More on Samadhi

More on Samadhi Meditation is not just about closing your eyes. That’s merely what you call “meditation.” It should be much more than that. Shakyamuni said to his disciples that when they know they are about to die, they should not enter samadhi. What this means is that their spiritual level is such that a person can enter samadhi on their own. So far, here in the New York area, you might find that there is perhaps only one person at that level.

the Potsdam Declaration

Here is the complete text of the Potsdam Declaration (also titled the “Proclamation Defining Terms for Japanese Surrender”), as issued on July 26, 1945 by the leaders of the United States, the Republic of China, and Great Britain. This text faithfully reproduces the full document as presented in historical archives: Proclamation by the Heads of Governments of the United States, the Republic of China, and Great Britain Issued at Potsdam, July 26, 1945 We, the President of the United States, the President of the National Government of the Republic of China, and the Prime Minister of Great Britain, representing the hundreds of millions of our countrymen, have conferred and agree that Japan shall be given an opportunity to end this war. Paperzz Ibiblio The prodigious land, sea and air forces of the United States, the British Empire and of China, many times reinforced by their armies and air fleets from the west, are poised to strike the final blows upon Japan. This military power is sustained and inspired by the determination of all the Allied nations to prosecute the war against Japan until she ceases to resist. Paperzz Ibiblio The result of the futile and senseless German resistance to the might of the aroused free peoples of the world stands forth in awful clarity as an example to the people of Japan. The might that now converges on Japan is immeasurably greater than that which, when applied to the resisting Nazis, necessarily laid waste to the lands, the industry and the method of life of the whole German people. Paperzz Ibiblio Until such a new order is established and until there is convincing proof that Japan’s war-making power is destroyed, points in Japanese territory to be designated by the Allies shall be occupied to secure the achievement of the basic objectives we are here setting forth. Paperzz The terms of the Cairo Declaration shall be carried out and Japanese sovereignty shall be limited to the islands of Honshū, Hokkaidō, Kyūshū, Shikoku and such minor islands as we determine. Paperzz The Japanese military forces, after being completely disarmed, shall be permitted to return to their homes with the opportunity to lead peaceful and productive lives. Paperzz We do not intend that the Japanese shall be enslaved as a race or destroyed as a nation, but stern justice shall be meted out to all war criminals, including those who have visited cruelties upon our prisoners. The Japanese Government shall remove all obstacles to the revival and strengthening of democratic tendencies among the Japanese people. Freedom of speech, of religion, and of thought, as well as respect for the fundamental human rights shall be established. Paperzz Nuclear Museum Japan shall be permitted to maintain such industries as will sustain her economy and permit the exaction of just reparations in kind, but not those industries which would enable her to re-arm for war. To this end, access to, as distinguished from control of, raw materials shall be permitted. Eventual Japanese participation in world trade relations shall be permitted. Paperzz Nuclear Museum The occupying forces of the Allies shall be withdrawn from Japan as soon as these objectives have been accomplished and there has been established in accordance with the freely expressed will of the Japanese people a peacefully inclined and responsible government. Paperzz Nuclear Museum We call upon the Government of Japan to proclaim now the unconditional surrender of all the Japanese armed forces, and to provide proper and adequate assurances of their good faith in such action. The alternative for Japan is prompt and utter destruction.

我的中国

我爱我的中国，我的母亲，我的祖国。我要把美好的青春献给你，大中国,盘着两条巨龙，中国祝福你不用千言和万语。年轻的朋友们今天来相会， 荡起小船儿，暖风轻轻吹， 花儿香，鸟儿鸣，春光惹人醉， 欢歌笑语绕着彩云飞。 啊，亲爱的朋友们，美妙的春光属于谁？ 属于我，属于你，属于我们八十年代的新一辈！ 再过二十年我们重相会， 伟大的祖国该有多么美！ 天也新，地也新，春光更明媚， 城市乡村处处增光辉。 啊，亲爱的朋友们，创造这奇迹要靠谁？ 要靠我，要靠你，要靠我们八十年代的新一辈！ 但愿到那时我们再相会， 举杯赞英雄，光荣属于谁？ 为祖国，为四化，流过多少汗？ 回首往事心中可有愧？ 啊，亲爱的朋友们，愿我们自豪地举起杯， 挺胸膛，笑扬眉，光荣属于八十年代的新一辈！ 光荣属于八十年代的新一辈！ 光荣属于八十年代的新一辈！

Retum Cancer

in JUly 2024, i had gone through brain operation. through mri and ct, one day they called me and told i had cancer. then, Dr Bearsley said i had to take radiation from Dr Mackala, in order to avoid the cancer may come back to the old place or other place. Radiation targeted to where the mass was located. and i need to take chemo pill. everyday 3 pills in the morning and 2 in the everning for 28 days. On simulation, i felt my palm felt numb. after 8 days, it's became havier. ends on August 22, 2025.

NO ONE KNOWS

按照我现在的标准, 这小区美国margii没有一个人懂得Ba’Ba’的教导， 密宗的历史由来出处，还有PROUT. 这个小区的美国白人， 那一个不是种族主义者， 那种种族主义已入到了他们的无意识的深度，不相信？ 我若说错了， 我下地狱， 我对，那你就下地狱。 According to my many years of experience in understanding people, those born on islands tend to have narrow minds — for example, people from Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, the Nordic countries, and so on. To change this kind of personality is very, very, very difficult; the only way is to practice Lesson Six more.

In Sanskrit grammar, the plural of sūtra (सूत्र)

In all vertions of Ananda Sutra, 1-21 written in: Bhumavyapte mahatiaham cittayorpranashe sagunasthitih savikapalsamadhih va. i think should be written in " Bhumavyaptemahat Ahamcittayorpranashe sagunasthitih savikalpa samadhih va. Because "sutra" is neuter. So the singular term for "sutra" is "sutram" also as a object. dual type is "sutre", and plural type is "sutrani"; so "Ananda Sutra" should be in "Ananda Sutram" and also as object. In Sanskrit grammar, the plural of sūtra (सूत्र) is: ➡️ sūtrāṇi (सूत्राणि) — in the nominative plural neuter. Explanation: sūtra is a neuter noun (it literally means “thread” or “aphoristic rule”). Neuter nouns in -a in Sanskrit (like deva → devāḥ for masculine, but sūtra is neuter) have: singular: sūtram dual: sūtre plural: sūtrāṇi So for example: ekam sūtram — one sūtra dve sūtre — two sūtras bahūni sūtrāṇi — many sūtras What's the difference between dual and plural? Good question — and it’s an important distinction in Sanskrit grammar! In Sanskrit, nouns, pronouns, adjectives, and verbs inflect not just for singular and plural (as in English), but also for dual. Here’s the difference: Number Meaning Example Singular (ekavacana) Refers to one item «devaḥ» — one god Dual (dvivacana) Refers to exactly two items «devau» — two gods Plural (bahuvacana) Refers to more than two items (three or more) «devāḥ» — gods (three or more) Why does Sanskrit have a dual? Sanskrit (like ancient Greek and a few other Indo-European languages) preserved the ancient dual number, which specifically marks two things. For example: mātā-pitarau — “the two parents” (mother & father) nayanē — “the two eyes” In English, we just say “parents” or “eyes” regardless of whether we’re thinking of two or more, but Sanskrit distinguishes. On verbs: The verb endings also reflect this number: singular: गच्छति (gacchati) — he/she/it goes dual: गच्छतः (gacchataḥ) — the two go plural: गच्छन्ति (gacchanti) — they (3+) go So the dual is used only when the subject (or object) is exactly two. The plural is used when the subject (or object) is more than two.

Ba'Ba' will never come to visit the United States

Ba'Ba' will never come to visit the United States I would like to say when a person's kundalinii raise up, he is not a human. He is super. He is super on everything. Do you know that? No, you don't, not until you get to that level. Most of the people, no matter, how long, how difficult,he or she practice, 40, 50, or 60 years or more, they still in the beggining level. Why? They don't know what He said. How super he is? You don't know. But here in this Katuah residential household, no one respect this kind of person. Most of them are white. They jdon't because their naive, because their arrogant, because they are hegemont. Base on this, that's why i say Ba'Ba' will never come to visit the United States.

poem

世间爹妈情最真, 泪血溶入儿女身。 殚竭心力终为子。 可怜天下父母心。

2 Anisha and Tusiita 的恶 行恶状恶业

3/28/2026I Not long ago, Anisha was walking her dog on Katuah Road while I was driving back home. I saw her in the middle of the road. I stopped the car and got out. I don’t hold grudges against anyone—that’s just my nature—and I had forgotten that she was against me. I walked up to Anisha and told her, “It’s very dangerous to walk in the middle of the road. You should walk on the side of the road.” Do you know what she said to me? “Fuck off.” That was her response. I didn’t reply. I quietly returned to my car. 7/1/2025 Anisha and Tusiita didn't like Antony put his lownmower into didi's barn. Because Antony has the key to the barn. They report to didi Usa, Didi Usha gave the authority power to Anisha and Tusiita. Anisha and Tusiita changed the lock and didn't want to give the new key to Antony. this is their way to refuse Antony use the barn. 他们开始交恶， so, Antony stop working for Anisha and Tusiita. More than that, Anisha and Tusiita started to complain Antony and lie to the public. They said Antony put the lownmoder on the public property. Acutually, Anotny put the lawnmower on the school and he got permission from sister xxx on 7/1/2025. anisha and Tusiita are the sockker of the blood. They like to manuver their rights and edgemony. 5/14 Tussta said they will remove everything on the shared driveway, the shrubbs still wet, wait for it dry up. 5/13 i need to write an article "why does Anisha hate Ganesha so much? i sent $2882.00 to Narada Today. (all together), $882 via Zelle in bank of america i took out $1000 from td bank account. i setup a good irrigation system on our yard., so Agusta will do it easily. 5/12 HOA members bully a Chinese by Yanglo Saxon is so obvious. Yanglo Saxon White, Australio White, Semitism White all here tried to make a great group so they have all the power to decide any decision. Before i came down to Asheville i found out there was something happened here. i didn't know why? Once i have conflict with Anisha Ramesha and Visha Mitra said i could not go to HOA meeting. On the easement problem on our land, Ramesha said to me " it is already existed in this way, why don't you accept it." Our land originally was free of easement. Now, it became not a whole piece. All because of They knew Anisha and Tussita are not easy to talk. so they want Rudranii to yield. They don't know me at all. They thought i'm an idiot and i don't speak English. Because Anisha and Tussita help Hiranmaya and Nityanprema, it is natural Hirananyamaya favor to Anisha andnd Tussita, I told everyone here they did this for so many years. that's the main reason for them, Anisha and Tussita don't care what the rules are. They don't care. and nobody said anything. so if i didn't pay hoa fee. and what you members are going to do? sue me? They do not follow the law for five years, why i can't? i want to become a hoa preskdent, to make a regulations on punishment, it is a service. otherwise, many years people are not respect themselves never want to follow the law, either the constitution law or covenant law. 5/6 Anisha was walking her dog in the middle of the road. Unfortunately, I was driving on that road. When I made a turn, I was shocked to see someone walking in the midadle of the road. So I stopped and advised her not to walk in the middle of the road. Her response was 'funk off.' Is 'funk off' any different from 'f*** you'? What's the difference?" we have an augument. she said fuck off. i said fuck you. she is walking the dog. i am driveing on the road. she should not leave the dog walking on the road. i told her long time ago, the martha jordan road is not for walking. she never listened. and i'm driving slow as usual. she accused me driving too fast. i never driving too fast. so we started fucking each other. 5/3 someone came and said i don't want to get involved. same thing i would tell this person, i don't want to have this kind of friend, eating, drinking then you come, trouble then you don't want to get involved. In the house warming ceremony, you swear you would support this community. You forgot what you are swearing? are you in this ccommunity? ok, you don't want to get involved. and i don't want to have you in my home. 4/22/2024 We had a yoga meditation class in the library last year. Unfortunately to us, Anisha volunteered working in this library. Anisha grabed this chance to talk bad about us. She talked to our students and to the workers in the liberay. I can not immagine what react from the students and workers. It is obvious the liberay stop the class. One of the students talked to rudranii and asked about what's going on. 4/26/2024 Anisha and Tusiita hired a handyman to work on the shared driveway. Rudranii saw them and called Hiranyamaya to inform him. He said that nobody should be working on the shared driveway. He also mentioned that Anisha and Tusiita had previously complained about something we placed on the border of the shared driveway. I need to explain something to all HOA members. Issues between Anisha and Tusiita, and us, are not just a private matter between two families. It's a concern for everyone in the community. The law is the law. If Anisha can put something on or work on the shared driveway, and you members think it's not your problem, you'll likely let it go this time. But if something similar happens again in your neighborhood, how would you resolve the problem then? Anisha and Tussita knew the rule but they still charge HOA bottom line again and again. They don't respect that we all agree what we agree. Yama and niyama, social moral would not accept this kind of attitude. Last year, you might have thought this was just an issue between families, so you said it was negative and that we shouldn't discuss it over email. No, any issue involving one of us affects the entire community. I don't understand how someone who's been part of this community for so many years could think otherwise. It's selfish. i had a map put on t roadside map direct my workers go to my house building side. but Anisha took it down and throw it to the ditch. Anisha is playing my mail box and broke the bar on my mail box. When she tried to break it and i found out i tried to put it back to normal. Next day she came and tried to break it. We played this game about three months. she enjoyed playing this game with me. she thought no one knows. At the end of the game, she broke the bar. and i took the bar home. today, i still had the bar. When i mentioned someone vandaling my mailbox, Hiranyamaya sugguested to put a survor. Ramesha and Anisha objected it. Later on when they lost their package, , they agreed to put on a suvoyor. it is so obvious, too me, it's a racism against me. 4/26/2024 Rudranii told Hiranmaya he is favored to Anisha and Tusiita. Hiranyamaya didn't admit it. he said she didn't understand and made a wrong judgement. Actually, it's very true. They are favored Anisha and Tusiita. Give an example this time, when rudranii complaining they are working some construction work on the shared driveway. They did it many times. Hiranyamaya didn't come to check. He attacked her with a saying "They also complaing we put things on the boarder of the shared driveway." At the first zoom meeting, i complained HOA members like to take advantge of us. One reason is Rudranii had a good heart. another reason is they thought i don't know how to speak English. Most of the time, i remained silence and quiet. i won't mind to get revenge in 10 years or 20 years. Just like i did on Vimananda and Shudbamonanda, these two evil dadas. That's why Visha Mitra cheated me on easement, on our land Before we don't have easement on our land. Put the electrical box on my land without discuss it with me and Anisha. i putup a roadmap on the road Anisha removed it and throw it to the ditch. i found out later and put it in my car. Anisha tried to break the handle on my mailbox. She could not break it in once. i found it out. i put the back to the original Next day she came to break it. In this way she play this game until the handle was broken. She stopped. Hiranyamaya suggested to setup a surveyor. Ramesha and Anisha went forward to go against it. Later, when this thing happened to them, then, they agreed Rici to set a surveyor up. See, i'm a Chinese. i was treated in a different way. Do you feel what i feel? A few days ago, I texted Karuna, saying, 'Your mom was bullied by HOA members today.' The reason I sent this message was to teach my son and daughter not to trust margii. To them, Yama and Niyama are just a joke. 打听别人家私事, 不是你们该做的事. They are having the garbage and put wood on the shared driveway, because you peiple are hypocripy, mistake is a mistake should correct it right away, HOA do nothing here. that's why no correction at all. i'm here will wake you guys everyday until you correct your mistake. HOA covenant alrady setup the rule on Shared driveway. Anisha and Tiussita broke the law. They tried to put stepways on the shared driveway last year. I stopped them to do it. The handyman hired by them wanted to hit me and threatened me by using a big shavel while he was faceing me and thrusted the shavel on the ground in front of me when i was talking to him. i said to him You want to hit me, Hit me. He calmed down a little bit. Dared not to hit me. 4/22/2024 Monday Anisha and Tussita did something on the driveway. Rudranii called Hiranyamaya about it. Hitranyamaya said he will come to check it. Nobody allowed to do anything on sharedriveway. The result was Hiranyamaya didn't show up. He may call Anisha and Tussita. They stopped the work. Anisha and Tussita did something against law again and again. They are also an executive on the board. Why? because we don't have a punishment clause on the covenant. We, HOA members should make a law on this kind of behavior. They put gabage on the shared driveway for years. They put the pile wood on the shared driveway for years. They didn't correct it. So We, members of the HOA have to tell them and force them to correct it. Usually, a member do something against HOA covenant or bylaw. They have a fined law to this kind of behavior. Like: You have one month to correct the violation. We fine you 30.00 a day untill you correct it. HOA will send them a legal letter or email to them. HOA has this kind of rights. So let's decide how much a day to fine Anisha and Tussita. They are the executive on board. They should not be the executive.

how to play chess?

Chess Pieces & Their Moves King (♔/♚) – Moves one square in any direction (horizontally, vertically, or diagonally). Check: If the king is under attack, it must be saved. Checkmate: If the king cannot escape attack, the game ends. Castling: A special move where the king moves two squares toward a rook, and the rook jumps over (only if neither has moved and no pieces block them). Queen (♕/♛) – Moves any number of squares horizontally, vertically, or diagonally. Rook (♖/♜) – Moves any number of squares horizontally or vertically. Involved in castling. Bishop (♗/♝) – Moves any number of squares diagonally. Knight (♘/♞) – Moves in an "L" shape (two squares in one direction, then one square perpendicular). Only piece that can jump over others. Pawn (♙/♟) – Moves forward one square, but captures diagonally forward. First move option: Can move two squares forward. En passant: If a pawn moves two squares past an enemy pawn, it can be captured as if it moved only one. Promotion: If a pawn reaches the opposite side, it can become any other piece (usually a queen). Special Rules Check: When a king is under attack, the player must move to stop the threat. Checkmate: When the king is in check with no legal moves to escape—game over. Stalemate: If a player has no legal moves but is not in check, the game is a draw. Draw: Also occurs by threefold repetition, 50-move rule (no captures/pawn moves in 50 moves), or insufficient material (e.g., king vs. king). Game Objective Win by checkmating the opponent’s king. Draw if neither player can win. 当然可以！国际象棋中的 “吃过路兵”（en passant） 是 pawn（兵）的一种特殊走法，中文通常称为 “吃过路兵” 或 “隘路吃兵”。以下是详细解释： Of course! The "en passant" in chess is a special move of the pawn, often referred to in Chinese as "eating a passer" or "passing a soldier". Here's the detailed explanation: 规则说明： Rule Description: 触发条件 Trigger conditions 当一方的兵 从初始位置（第2行或第7行）一步前进两格 时，如果这个兵落在对方相邻的兵的 同一横线（相邻列），对方可以选择用兵“斜吃”它，仿佛它只走了一格。 When a pawn advances two squares from its initial position (row 2 or row 7), if the pawn lands on the same horizontal line (adjacent column) as the opponent's neighboring pawn, the opponent can choose to "eat" it diagonally with the pawn as if it had only gone one square. 例如： For example: 白兵在 e2，黑兵在 f4。 White pawns are at e2 and black pawns are at f4. 白兵从 e2 → e4（前进两格），此时黑方的 f4 兵可以 斜吃到 e3，同时移除白方的 e4 兵。 White moves from e2 → e4 (two squares), at which point Black's f4 pawn can eat diagonally to e3 and remove White's e4 pawn. 执行时机 Timing of execution 必须立刻吃！如果对方不选择在下一步马上“吃过路兵”，之后就不能再吃。 Must eat it right away! If the other party does not choose to "eat the passerby" right away in the next step, they will not be able to eat again. 限制条件 Restrictions 只有兵能“吃过路兵”，其他棋子不行。 Only pawns can "eat passing soldiers", not other pawns. 被吃的兵必须是因为 第一步前进两格 才触发此规则。 The pawn being eaten must be triggered by the first move two squares. 为什么有这个规则？ Why is there such a rule? 历史上，兵最初只能走一格。后来为了加速开局，允许兵第一步走两格，但为了避免兵借此“绕过”敌方兵的威胁，加入了“吃过路兵”规则，保持战术公平性。 Historically, pawns were initially limited to one block. Later, in order to speed up the start, the pawn was allowed to make two squares in the first step, but in order to prevent the pawn from "bypassing" the threat of the enemy pawn, the rule of "eating the passing pawn" was added to maintain tactical fairness. 中文示例： Chinese example: 黑兵在 c4，白兵在 d2。 The black pawn is on c4 and the white pawn is on d2. 白兵从 d2 → d4（前进两格），黑兵可以 从 c4 斜吃到 d3，吃掉白兵（d4 被移除）。 White creeps go from d2 → d4 (two squares forward), and black creeps can eat diagonally from c4 to d3 and eat white creeps (d4 is removed). 简单来说，就是“趁对方的兵走两格时，用相邻的兵斜吃它，就像它只走了一格”。这个规则容易忽略，但对实战很有用！ 😊 To put it simply, "take advantage of the opponent's pawn to move two squares, eat it diagonally with the adjacent pawn, as if it had only gone one square". This rule is easy to ignore, but useful in real combat! 😊 New chat

Western Countries Exploitation

Why does China focus solely on infrastructure development in its foreign aid, while Western countries not only build infrastructure but also engage in missionary work? When Professor Zhang Weiwei heard this question, a confident smile—typical of him—appeared on his face. Yet the smile seemed to carry a profound insight into the essence of the question. He began to speak slowly, in a steady and powerful voice. "I once had the privilege of a deep conversation with an African scholar," he said. "During our talk, he raised a similar point. He said that when Western countries come to Africa, they are enthusiastic about building churches. The underlying purpose is to promote an entire set of Western values to the African people." According to Professor Zhang’s recollection, the African scholar had a confused look on his face, puzzled, and asked: "Why don’t you Chinese do the same?" To this, Professor Zhang thought for a moment and partly quoted Premier Zhou Enlai’s speech at the 1955 Bandung Conference: "Chinese culture emphasizes seeking common ground while reserving differences. It possesses a strong inclusiveness." He then explained that this is not just diplomatic rhetoric or hollow political jargon—it is a deeply rooted aspect of Chinese historical and cultural tradition. Looking back at history, Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism have coexisted harmoniously on Chinese soil—interacting, blending, and developing together. To foreigners accustomed to monotheism, this is nothing short of a miracle—a cultural phenomenon both difficult to comprehend and yet undeniably real. Fast forward to July 2023: another military coup erupted in Niger, once again capturing global attention. The world’s media zoomed in. In front of international cameras, an officer of the Nigerien Presidential Guard, visibly emotional and indignant, spoke his mind: "We have abundant resources. So why do we live like slaves?" This deeply personal question struck a nerve, prompting reflection on Africa’s past and present. In truth, this seemingly simple statement is a true reflection of Africa’s centuries-long history. And the root cause of all this suffering? The Western powers that still dominate the global stage. Back in the 15th century, the Portuguese began exploring Africa. Navigation technology was still relatively underdeveloped at the time, so their progress was slow. But in the mid-15th century, with funding from Prince Henry of Portugal, brave navigators set sail once again. This marked the beginning of European colonizers stepping onto African soil. Portuguese captains, along with explorers from the regions of present-day Italy, driven by a hunger for wealth, risked everything. They spread the word of Africa’s riches across Europe, triggering a blood-soaked wave of colonial plunder. In their scramble for colonies, slaves, minerals, and markets, the European powers cast off their mask of civility, revealing their true greedy and brutal nature. Africa became a battleground of looting and violence. Different European countries fought each other for control of African land, engaging in endless bloodshed and atrocities. As time passed, most of Africa’s colonies fell into the hands of France, Britain, and other European powers. Colonial exploitation gave these nations the capital they needed for industrialization. They drained Africa’s resources to fuel their own economic development—while Africans sank deeper into suffering. Even today, in the highly developed 21st century, France—the most aggressive colonizer in Africa—has not stopped plundering the continent. Using economic control and military intimidation, France continues to extract wealth from West African nations. According to economists, France takes over $800 billion annually from Africa. With a population of only 68 million, this means each French citizen benefits from $12,000 worth of African wealth every year—nearly equivalent to China’s per capita GDP. Such a staggering disparity reveals the severe degree of France’s economic exploitation of Africa. But economic plunder alone is not sustainable. To reduce resistance and ensure the longevity of their colonial project, Western colonizers turned to another powerful tool: spiritual conquest through missionary work. An old African proverb encapsulates this irony: "They came with the Bible and took away the gold." This simple yet profound saying exposes the true face of many Western missionaries in Africa—far from the noble, benevolent image portrayed online. In reality, many were not kind-hearted saints but key enablers of colonial rule, acting as spiritual accomplices to the gun-wielding colonizers. Western conquest was both military and mental, symbolized by the cross and the sword advancing together. As Lu Xun once said: "If one can find joy in the life of a slave, then truly, there is no redemption." Western missionaries spread Catholicism not for salvation, but to pacify the oppressed African natives—to make them believe their suffering was due to original sin, not colonial oppression. The goal was to numb their spirit, making them accept colonial rule rather than resist it. In the eyes of the Western colonizers, a good African slave should work at least 14 hours a day, then drag their exhausted body to church, buy indulgences from the church, and pray for God’s forgiveness. The Western missionary, standing on the pulpit, would say: "Your sins are forgiven. Poverty needs no change. After all, it’s harder for a rich man to enter heaven than for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle. You suffer now, but you’ll go to heaven. Just endure. Amen." Thus filled with a false hope of heavenly reward, these poor souls would wake the next day under the whip—and proudly offer their labor once again, unaware they had fallen into a spiritual trap meticulously crafted by the West. Aside from this spiritual anesthetic, missionaries also played another role: a buffer between colonizers and natives. Colonial exploitation was often so brutal that resistance was inevitable. For example, in the 19th century, King Leopold II of Belgium forced Congolese laborers to increase banana production under inhumane conditions—chopping off the limbs of those who failed. This sparked intense local resistance. That’s when the Catholic Church intervened. Missionaries came to the villages, offering basic supplies and medical aid in the name of charity. But in exchange, they asked the locals to convert to religion, thereby dissolving their desire to resist. To be fair, some missionaries were morally upright, much like Dr. Norman Bethune, who aided China during its war of resistance. Some did provide healthcare and education that improved lives. But ultimately, even their good deeds served to prolong the cruel colonial system—a system that extracted material wealth while inducing spiritual submission. In the end, both body and soul were taken by the West. Africans were pushed into an abyss of misery. But thankfully, a new dawn rose on the horizon—from the distant East. China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) offered Africa a path out of hell. The BRI, based on the principles of consultation, collaboration, and shared benefit, has created new development opportunities for African nations. Unlike the West, which sees Africa as a servant, China treats African nations as partners. The West views China’s involvement in Africa as a threat—labeling it “neo-colonialism”—because they fear losing their traditional grip on the region. But China doesn’t argue. It lets the African people speak for themselves. And in their eyes, China has a very positive image. China offers aid and loans without political strings attached, respects the sovereignty of African nations, and does not interfere in their internal affairs. Chinese companies also provide valuable jobs. In Tanzania, for instance, a Chinese employer can hire a domestic helper for just 12 RMB (about $1.60) for half a day—an extraordinarily high wage locally. These jobs have brought hope to many families. Moreover, China’s aid focuses on key sectors like healthcare, infrastructure, education, and agriculture, which are directly linked to people’s livelihoods—unlike many Western NGOs that focus on animal protection and block ivory trade, depriving East African nations of economic opportunities. In healthcare, Chinese medical teams offer free services, treating diseases and improving public health. In infrastructure, China builds roads, bridges, and railways, boosting economic development. In education, China trains skilled professionals, raising educational standards. In agriculture, China teaches advanced techniques, helping solve food shortages. China may not be the most technologically advanced, but it is certainly the most sincere. It does not see Africa as a marketplace to exploit or a cultural subject to dominate. Instead, China aims to build a shared future for humanity—a world where every nation can chart its own path. In short, China’s only wish is simple: that the world’s poor and underdeveloped nations can become prosperous and engage in trade. China is willing to offer a hand through aid and cooperation. It all comes down to four characters: 求同存异—“seek common ground while reserving differences.” Through the Belt and Road framework, China and Africa are writing a new chapter of development, grounded in mutual benefit and shared progress.

When it's favor to you, you want free trade, if reverse, then you say it's not fair.

Could it be fair to say that we are witnessing Western Opportunism in its truest form? As long as free trade worked for all of you. You said free trade globalization. Now that Asian countries, now that the global South is catching up. You say lthis is not fair, there are too many tariffs and so on. Is this what it's all about?

Visha Mitra, a white racist

From my observation over the years, Anglo-Saxon people can never understand what “Zen” is. Never ever have I met one who knows all of these years. One reason I know is that they can never understand Chinese. Visha Mitra placed this electrical box on my property without my permission or even discussing it with me. Why? Because I’m Chinese. He thinks he can easily bully me. And also because he is white, and Anisha is white. White people always favor white people. Don’t think Ananda Marga is free from racism—it has more racism than a Christian group or a Buddhist group. This will be a dark stain on Visha Mitra’s life forever. The same goes for Ramesha, Anisha, and Tusiita. I will make sure 1.4 billion Chinese people know about this—once, twice, a million times. I will keep speaking out again and again. Even if it means having no friends here, I will uphold my moral principles. Years ago, I told Jaganat Visha Mitra didn’t want to sell his land to him. He was afraid that more Chinese were coming in, so white favoritism couldn’t stay here. Luckily, Sharadha left, and she was so smart to see things so clearly. She left because she saw so many ex-acraya here was not right. Sooner or later, it will come out what’s going on. Really, now, you can see the bad things happened here. Makes me vomiting over those ex. Gossip is the masterpiece of this small Margii group. It thrives here, and everyone competes to see who knows the most. I’m afraid of these people, especially the sisters—they never stop gossiping, no matter what. By the end of this year, I might even crown a Gossip Queen and Gossip King in this small group—or perhaps among the Katuah HOA members. Lately, I’ve been selling a house, which has drawn attention from the Margiis—especially the sisters—who keep asking whether it’s true or not. Margiis are always obsessed with knowing how much money I have. Even the acharyas never stop prying for details. At first, I thought they just wanted donations from me. But now, even after I’ve been open about it, they still keep digging. Because of this, I hide myself away. I don’t want to show my face in the group, yet they still won’t leave me alone. I’ve realized one thing: American Margiis never truly mature into real men.

美国跪了

briefing Heavy rare earths can only be purified to 99.999% purity in China, and only when this purity is reached can it be used. The U.S. can only achieve 95% purification levels, so all countries need to import from China. 这一次显然是为了稀土而来的。我们先要讲为什么？稀土这么重要， 讲讲稀土讲很久，但是那个重要性一直到这一次的关税战，那当中国卡着稀土从4月2号, 开始操作他的解放日，你看你，你，你回头再看看4月2号川普的神情气色，拿着那个乱七八糟的大看板，告诉大家等这一天等很久了吧？那这个解放日到了。俨然就是十拿九稳，轻轻松松，就是大家都准备要来跪。接下来他还告诉你，好多国家都排队来亲我们屁股，都要求我要能够原谅他，要能够帮助他，但是当中国不跪的时候，中国不跪，从4月2号到现在为止两个多月的时间，中国不跪，对美国造成了多大的杀伤力？中国凭什么有这么大的杀伤力？美国可从来没有对中国松手过，有关于半导体，AI晶片，各方面的管制，甚至于包括了EDA的限制，一波又一波，没有任何消减的迹象，但是当中国不跪的时候，为什么川普低头，美国要跪了，川普低头从打电话给习开始，你就知道他急着要跟习近平通话，除了中国，电话里就知道他急着要跟习近平通话。除了中国之外，你看到美国到现在为止唯一跟他达成所谓的关税，其实就是英国。为什么这次在英国？ 每个国家都会去美国跟美国谈关税的问题，美国却要来英国跟中国谈关税协议，那不是很奇怪吗？习不接Trump的电话，正好信息需要去英国访问，那我们就在英国谈好了。稀土把美国给卡住了，大家当然会觉得稀土看起来真的很重要，因为大部分人是不会接触到稀土，看不到，摸不到，也无法想象所谓的稀土。而且中国的出口额来讲，其实也不多啊。总金额很小，大概就是十来亿，大概就是这个量。那为什么呢？全世界都紧张，因为稀土就是你就跟每天吃的盐巴一样，如果你没有盐，你就不用做菜了，但如果放多了，你也不要。但是没有你就不行。那因此呢，当今天呢，稀土作为工业的维他命，就是大树的工业，产业的维他命，维他命你，你，你会吃很多，你会你会买了一罐维他命全部到肚子，不不会，它不是食物。本身，你。你可能每天都每天是当你没有的时候，你需要补充的时候，医生说你需要补充的时候，不管是闭群也好是啥，我也总会也言之，你就知道你缺什么，你需要你就要补，那它在过去被称为工业维他命。可是呢，今天当你没有的时候，它就是你的还魂丹好，那现在的现在的稀土的重要性。慢慢的，今天所有跟跟中国谈的基本上面很焦虑的他们来讲，最核心的就是稀土，美国欧洲印度日本韩国焦虑的都是同一个东西，这些国家全部呢都都在瓦森纳的签约国里面，包括印度，包括美国，包括俄罗斯。全部都在瓦森纳协定里面。瓦森纳协议里面没有装中国，为什么没有中国？因为他就是要对付中国。好，那我们待会时间再再解释一下。瓦森纳协议呢，是怎么来的？可是稀土在这个时刻，当美国呢，发现原来要提炼稀土，它不是光是污染或者是成本的问题。对中国的成本呢？比比美国的提炼大概少40%到五十，换到中国用一半的价格就可以提炼出呢，美国办不到的那个纯度，中国提炼稀土的纯度达到99.999， 其他国家和美国都只能做到99.5， 99.5 是不能用的，那这些高纯度的稀土，尤其是重稀土，用在哪里？美国的军工产业，如果光是电动车的电池等等，这些的使用，比较好解决，不需要高纯度的稀土，高纯度的稀土是使用在军工产业，譬如说我们知道隐形战机的涂装，隐形战机的涂装里面没有高纯度的重稀土，雷达，主动向位的雷达，没有高纯度的重稀土是不行的。导弹的那个陀螺仪，导弹的陀螺仪里面，其实最重要的是它，它为什么能够能感应到呢？就是地球当中的这些磁北极，因为它里面是磁铁，那个永磁基本上面的是需要高纯度的重稀土，就是因为稀土所做的稀土磁铁，它的重量要比用铁做的磁铁要来的轻，而且薄，它才能够让很多的电子产品走向轻薄短小化。今天，当我们在所有大国之间的军事较量，导弹，雷达跟隐形战机大概就是要这三样，如果没有稀土，你统统办不到。今天我要引述一下，这本书是锂战，就是美国的一位调查记者他所写的一本书，它里面有特别提到，比如说这一个对于雷射导弹，夜视镜，X光技术，所生产的各种武器，稀土都不可或缺。他举例说：F35一台战斗机上面要使用417公斤的稀土，而且这个稀土全部都来自于中国，F35上面的417公斤的稀土全部来自于中国，然后呢，苹果要使用稀土，才能够让iPhone震动的那个触觉引擎可以使用。好，那么通用动力公司用稀土来打造维吉尼亚级的核动力攻击潜舰，所以包括了F35，包括了美国的核动力潜舰，其实里面都用了大量由中国大陆所生产精炼，而且转换成为稀土磁铁的这个东西其实全部都来自于中国。那这件事情其实是过去这五十年来所造成的结果，并不是一两年就能够造成的结果，但对美国来讲，可能大部分觉得说没关系，中国不给你，那以美国的技术，以西方的技术来讲，你自己练吗？稀土矿呢？到处都有的， 并不是，就是中国，中国本身呢，掌握总体的稀土的资源，提炼出来的这些资源掌握70%，如果是重稀土，中国的掌握达到80%以上，那这里面还牵扯到一个问题，就是到目前为止，其实只有中国一直有关于稀土的提炼技术上面不断的兹兹酷酷的往前走，所以现在有关于稀土提炼的核心技术专利几乎全部都在中国手上，在所有的稀土的提炼的技术专利里面48%都是中国的，而且48%里面核心技术的专利全部都在中国手上，所以你不是光是自己要去想办法提炼稀土，因为你根本没有办法，就是我们说的专利，是一个布满地雷的道路，你走在那个路上的时候，有一些专利的布雷，你根本绕不过去。你走到那个地雷区前面，你就得要停住， 要不然就准备被炸。那因此面对稀土这件事情，美国现在已经莫可奈何，我在想就是说，当我在想这件事情是倒过来讲，我就想说习近平为什么要去接川普电话，你可以不接啊。我说我说接干嘛，接你不是在这帮川普解套谁看不出来？川普很急，川普焦头烂额，川普呢，在前一天的时候都已经讲了，说习很tough， 要跟他谈成协议非常困难，可是你为什么接了，我认为接的原因只有一个，就是中国现在非常有底气，因为在稀土这件事情上面，它无可替代，我们待会儿再来解释一下呢瓦森纳协议；中国在想些什么？因为昨天的金融时报终于摸到一点点边了。 我觉得这件事情为什么会小看稀土这件事情是全世界都小看，嗯，你知道在2010年的时候，当中日之间发生了在钓鱼台的冲撞事件之后呢？那个时候中国大陆其实就已经禁止稀土销往日本。那时候日本是想翻身想方设法的，后来是透过韩国那么用转接的方式，然后呢就比较用高的价钱，然后从韩国买到了稀土。那个时候呢，稀土作为贸易武器这件事情，全世界是有疑虑。因为就觉得稀土全世界都有，不是说只有你中国大陆的稀土矿我们现在也知道说乌克兰很多稀土矿，Greenland有很多稀土矿，加拿大很多稀土矿，澳大利亚也有很多稀土矿，其实美国内部也有很多稀土矿，他会觉得说那你只要放宽一点环保标准，这些稀土矿都可以开采。所以呢，在2010年的时候，这本书里头有描述的很细腻哦，就是说2010年的时候，那时候他们举行了一次听证会，美国国会举行了一次听证会，然后就讨论说这个稀土这件事情会不会被中国大陆卡脖子。2010年中国大陆没有拿这个武器来对付美国； 是对付日本呢？而美国其实已经坐立难安了，然后结果呢？那个时候其实美国的矿业公司，就是几乎是在泪诉他说我在全美国找不到任何一个有研究稀土的美国大学生，一个都没有，因为美国所有的稀土的系所全部关闭了。在1970年直到1990年代，美国政府觉得这个不稀奇，所以把所有的大学所有的稀土的系所全部都关闭了。各校因为无利可图，所以都纷纷都关闭了，因为美国军方已经不资助了。相反的，中国大陆从徐光宪回到了中国大陆之后， 就一路在更深化做稀土方面的研究所以现在两边就一强一弱就形成了很强烈的对比。然后那一家那家矿业公司说我只有17位科学家，可是中国大陆至少有六千位科学家在做稀土相关的研究，我是没有办法跟他们竞争的。可是美国军方还是认为这不是策略性的这个战略物资，所以在2010年把他们手上的稀土的所有的库存全部卖光了。就是说简单来说，美国根本小看了稀土，或者说全世界都小看了稀土。我觉得中国大陆，也在办，以我觉得半信半疑当中确立了稀土的不可替代性。所以在一开始的时候呢，他其实收收放放，不太愿意那么很快的全面性的用稀土作为贸易武器，因为担心各国如果开发了之后呢？他的稀土的这个部分的利基就不见了，但是经过了15年，从2010年一直到现在，澳洲也试着开发过，加拿大也试着开发过，现在Broombird，按照他的调查，美国至少要花十年的时间,才可能摆脱对于中国大陆的稀土依赖。我觉得这件事情Broombird也许高估了美国的能力，因为那个有一个前提，就是我下定决心，那中国大陆这个社会容易下定决心，可是美国这个社会不容易下定决心，而且稀土我们刚刚讲,赚不了多少钱，所以企业不愿意投入啊，它基本上是一个战略性的投入, 赚不了多少钱，所以一个资本主义社会来讲。你要去怂恿一些人, 投入到稀土的生产。那是不太可能的事情。好吧，我们，我们先撇开可不可能，因为在过去，有关于有关于稀土的技术跟生产为为什么现在八，九十都在中国的手上，尤其是跟军工，高科技领域所需要的中重稀土都在中国的手上，必须要养中国之鼻息， 在过去中国呢？没有做任何的出口审查跟管制的时候，经常进入正常进出的时候，你完全感觉不到这种只占贸易量当中一点点的稀土的重要性，但是这个时候呢，感觉到了，而且发现它无可替代。那中国呢，在稀土。我之所以说到昨天，今天6月9号，到昨天呢，我看到伦敦的金融时报的一篇的报道，我发现他终于摸到一点点边了，可是那个逻逻辑是错的，伦敦的金融时报，引述了许多专家跟业界的分析，他说，中国成功地把出口管制武器化。然后接着呢？限制稀土的出口，扰乱全球供应链，并且施压美国。这段话的陈述是标准的金融时报的陈述的方式，可是金融时报他不知道是，是装糊涂还是怎么样，把所有的出口管制武器化，做得最落实的是瓦森纳协议，就是美国带头的，就是美国带头的好。当然了，在过去呢，19世纪二十世纪的时候，英国啦。这些国家呢，都干过这种出口管理，只有我有，只有我能做得出来，那我就掐死你，你要不然就是付很高很高的的钱，要不然就是乖乖的跟我低头。好，那他后面再提到，就是说其实其实重点在于，就是说中国不止，借着呢，美国跟他的盟友们比较高科技领域的这些盟友们，极端的需要稀土。那除了卡死美国以外为什么中国的出口管制的武器化？会非常的成功，因为中国同时在警告，那些可能配合美国的国家，你如果敢跟美国配合，我就帮你算在一起。所以导致许多，美国看起来有控制力的国家。那个时候跟美国都要表现强硬，都要跟美国表现疏离。所以稀土打造的不是只有美国连美国周围的朋友。中国警告说我现在跟美国在一对一单挑，你们不要进来，大家就退到旁边去了。为什么这些呢？过去的美国的小兄弟，这个时候都乖乖站站旁边，你有没有注意到所有的国家。，对中美之间的这场的关税贸易的恶斗？所有的国家都沉默，全部沉默。沉默的原因除了他们本身呢，也是美国关税战的受害者，主要是因为只要你要稀土，只要你要有了全体系的制造业的供应，所有的出口品都在中国的手上，然后过过日子，你自己看着办。所以中国这一次把所所谓的出口管制武器化不仅让美国痛不欲生，让川普动弹不得，而且叫天天不应，叫地不灵。所有的那些的盟友们都袖手旁观，谁敢伸手，中国就敲你。所以美国这一次的关税战，原本希望能够形成一个包围中国的战，甚至连越南都要求要低头，结果现在发现没有任何一个国家不和中国配合。中国在稀土上面，很轻松的就完成了反包围，就是让你美国人叫人呢，都没有人愿意跟你，因为我如果这是呼应美国，我也受伤，我们听到的除了美国以外，日本，印度，法国，德国都在教“我需要稀土”，中国怎么可以这样子卡住稀土。就是因为这些的国家的警报器都在叫，包括韩国在内都在叫，大家就知道就是需要稀土的，不是只有你美国，这个时候如果呢，你要去配合美国，如果甚至于你要偷偷的为美国，从我这里出口稀土，送到美国的手上，我照样修理你。所以中国这一次的出口管制。非常的严厉，以至于呢，让美国呢，知道接下去呢，不好办了，因为稀土十年之内美国是不可能有任何满足，更何况他的盟友美国自己都都没有了这些盟友，更不要说了。换句话说，如果美国说十年，那些盟友，起码要盘算二十年，三十年不计代价的去发展，你才有可能捞回一点点的稀土的主控权。坦白讲，十年二十年三十年，这个在一般的实施是跟科技发展的进程，那讨论是没有意义的，因为因为没有人会这样做，也没有人相信你会开始为十年之后二十年之后呢？预做彩排，美国即使说，我们跟哪里呢？可以签所谓的稀土的采矿协议，您尽量踩了之后，连美国本土的稀土矿，美国本土也有新鲜稀土矿，那个稀土矿还蛮有名的。其实美国本土的稀土矿，它提炼到一定程度之后怎么办？送到中国做最后的精炼，没有经过中国最后的精炼都不能用。换句话说，你的高科技领域，通通不能用。那中国在我们看到，这个金融时报在讲在引用的就像全风险咨询机构等等的许多的专家，中国的这个就是说呢，测纬咨询公司，龙洲经讯等等。他引用了好几个，就是说呢，全球的专业的这些咨询跟评估公司的结论都一样。这个出口管制把美国给打到了，可是他们都没有尽到一个更深层的逻辑里面出口管制武器化，中国不可以，你要知道金融时报在在做这些报道的时候，俨然就是中国弄了一个小手段，而且是不光明的小手段。然后呢，把把美国的脖子给掐住了，把盟友的脖子给掐住了，俨然就是说你中国怎么可以这样子做呢？怎么可以这么阴险呢？怎么可以大家都需要稀土，你有稀土怎么可以不给我们用的，那接下去我们就可以看看瓦森纳协定；什麽是瓦森纳协议？ 瓦森纳协议1996年，全世界对这个协议最有感觉，甚至唯一有感觉只有中国，这个协议，瓦斯纳协议，瓦斯那在荷兰，其实1949年当冷战开始了之后，美国就在巴黎，美国纠合它的北约的盟友们在巴黎成立了一个叫做巴黎统合委员会，在过去，大陆的简称叫巴统，就是巴黎统合委员会。这个巴黎统合委员会呢？它只有一个原则，就是所有要出口到社会主义国家的出口品，尤其是有科技含金量的这些产品跟原物料全部管制，那因为是社会主义国家，统统都适用，那个时候主要是针对苏联，后来1991年苏联垮了，垮了之后，许多的前苏联的国家，现在都已经是欧盟的成员，都已经进到北约了。而那个时候呢，因为因为苏联垮了之后呢，一开始的时候，俄罗斯那个时候呢，不管是在叶尔钦的时代，或者是Gebachefu的时代，跟西方的关系都很好，所以再把包括苏联，俄罗斯列为制裁，不合理。这个时候，原来的巴统就改组，在1995年重新的开会，在荷兰，就美国再把它的核心的朋友圈加俄罗斯，和新朋友加俄罗斯， 来签瓦格纳协议，可是当时并没有中国。当时的中国表面上跟美国关系是不错的，但1996年，他找了俄罗斯，印度都在里面。换句话说呢，美国在找他的朋友圈的时候，那个瓦斯纳协议让中国看破时候的手脚，知道你美国对中国是怎么想的，而那个瓦森纳协议呢，就把所有的对于所有特定对象的出口品，其实已经没有了，就中国而已。其他的高科技的出口品跟原料他都必须要符合什么？N减二元原则，N减二原则是什么？今天如果中国跟他的，就是今天，如果美国跟他的盟盟友圈用的是最先进的技术是N，那提供给所谓的不确定国家主要是中国，要减两代，就是必须要跟他现在差两代，这个差两代与原则就成为瓦森纳协议当中对中国的出口管制的标准模式。这个瓦森纳协议因为只有中国适用和它的适用范围是非常广的，它里面包括简单讲就是他用一个盖概括性的概念。只要是军民两用的技术跟原料的清单统统都符合瓦森纳协议，那里面呢，就包括了什么，有22大类的武器弹药跟做作战平台涵盖九大类的这些领域包括先进材料电子器材计算机半导体设备导航及航空电子仪器等等。2019年川普1.0的时候，川普为什么在稀土当中， 吃了亏之后叫不出来，因为2019年川普1.0除了制裁华为，除了像华为死，除了抓孟晚舟，除了打关关税战半导体全部限制出口之外，他把半导体呢也放进瓦森纳协议。N减二代，就在半导体当中，被落实， 其实不止N减N代，其实现在是N减N代了，N减N代根本就什么都不给你。当你在半导体当中都摆在瓦森纳协议的时候，拉着你的盟友全面打压中国的崛起，从1996年打到现在三十年。打压中国是全面性的，这个瓦森纳协议是全面性的，是所有的出口品跟原物料，只要到中国的，他都必须要符合两个当瓦萨那协议里面并没有说呢，特别针对中国，我说因为它只适用于中国，所以你就不用去管住啊，它是普遍性的，没有没有什么普遍性的，因为其他的都都是签约国。那只有中国的这个大国，它不是签约国，我是连印度都在里面了。中国对印度药信信多少算，它里面的是用两个原则，第一个就是协商一致原则，你要出口给特定对象的军民两用的产品，必须要所有的国家都同意，因为那里面针对的是四个国家。就是包括了北韩，伊朗还有伊拉克，那只有中国是真正在军事上面的大国。对了，所以我我就说其实其他的人就都不用管了，就是其他的那些社会主义国家人都不用管，就是中国而已，因为中国是最难搞的，他就全力来打压中国。第一个要协商看他才1996年，对大家都要一直第二个。就是信息要相互通报你不可以偷偷给他的东西你做了什么你都要都要通报。敏感的项目三个月之内呢，一定要通报，基于信息一致就是共识决出口得给这些的国家的产品主要是中国必须要共识，所有的42个国家都要有共识。后来慢慢的俄罗斯因为跟中国的关系很好，他们发现跟俄罗斯呢要达成共识，越来越困难，美国就开始呢。另外呢，再搞一套出口管制的东西，但基本上面还是在瓦森纳协议的框架下面运作。这一次中国从头到尾他都没有跟你谈瓦森纳协议，可是中国在出口管制军民两用的管制。来讲，完全符合瓦森纳协议，中国就就成为瓦森纳协议真正在落实瓦森纳协议的。既然你你说依照瓦森纳协议军民两用的出口都必须要管制，我就管制。所以你现在军用的东东西跟中国谈就不好谈了，不可能谈得成的。所以现在表面上面稀土放行，可是因为他还在他的管制。范围之内，所以他还在一个一个案子的审核，而且审核的时候呢，审核的时间为什么要那么长，因为他们要签很多很多的文件，你必须要保证你绝对不会转卖，然后你必须要保证你是用在你自己的企业如何如何，可是除此之外也不是那么简单，你写个保证书就可以了，因为印度有很多做假的，那之后就会有惩罚。除了有这些之外，他们还有追踪，就是我这个最终产物呢。实际上面用在什么地方，我要去追踪你的实际上面，你比如说你说你用在汽车好，那你汽车生产多少量，你用过多少量，他要做最终的这个审查，甚至于包括了卫星的追踪，这些稀土的一些呃，这个往往外的一个输出的一些状况。那么很重要的是军方所使用的稀土统统拿不到。所以现在卡军方还是卡的很死啊。嗯，所以军民两用。我觉得这里面有一件事情很很特别的地方就在这边，因为1996年就开始跟中国大陆的军事上面是完全拒绝往来，而且不提供任何的技术。也不提供任何的原材料。所以中国大陆现在的军事上面反而是完全自主的。嗯，一几乎看不到在军事上面有任何卡他脖子的地方，即便是半导体，因为军事的武器哦，到没有先进到那样子先进的制程。三奈米二奈米真的不需要到那种程度。其实手机是很需要的，可是呢，在军事武器上面也体积够大，它不需要用到三奈米二奈米，那么因此你在三奈米二奈米上面，你是卡住了中国的脖子，可是你在军事武器上面就完全没有。所以现在回过头来，再瓦圣纳或反瓦圣那这个协议当中。中国大陆现在有卡脖子的武器，可是美国现在反而没有，就没有办法来来他脖子，美国卡了三十年，特别是因为瓦森纳协定里面的条文，又特别强调不针对特定国家，但是其实它针对特定国家，你要知道所有的这些的国际的文件经常是欲盖弥彰的。就是你不要看那个文字的表面，你要看那个政治运作的惯性，虽然不针对特定对象，但是他就针对特定对象，而且只针对一个特定对象，因为其他的对象根本就不重要。那这个时候，瓦森纳协定，其实形同瓦解，是因为这三十年，中国没有被卡死，中国的科技发展到今天，从1996年之后，所有对中国的敏感性的出口，包括原料全面砍，那以为呢，这样子呢，可以呢？当苏联瓦解了之后，不会有另外一个社会主义大国，美国认为中国其实1996年的瓦森纳协议，简单讲就是美国认为联中制俄，就已经过了，中国已经没有利用价值了。所以接下去呢，中国才是他要提防的对象。因为在1996年克林顿的时代，克林顿的这个时代的这个动作就确定中国没有利用价值了，相反的中国可能是敌人，所以呢，就把中国列为了封锁的对象，但是这三十年，你过去可以卡死俄罗斯？在巴统时代可以卡死苏联， 可是以为可以闷死中国，结果失败了，除了半导体之外，中国呢？几乎呢。现在所有的科技的科技的品相陆陆续续的突围，而且在技术上面来讲，都绕道而行，绕过你西方的所掌控的技术，所以今天，当你这样子对付中国。没有人在这一段时间里面特别的谈论瓦森纳协议加诸在中国身上的痛苦。所有对于对中国的封锁跟打压，包括就是登月的计划，对中国任何国家都可以跟美国合作，太空站都可以，但中国不可以，它其实就在瓦森纳协议里面，没错，让中国的根本动弹不得。因此今天你要跟中国谈不好谈为什么？因为中国呢，让你打压了三十年的时间，中国今天呢，虽然出口管制西方说你怎么可以把出口管制武器化，那是因为呢，你不敢谈瓦森纳协议，带头用出口管制武器化，把所有的西方的盟友，连印度都扣在一起。我们一起闷死中国，结果呢？中国脱困了，中国脱困了之后呢，今天你要再跟中国谈的出口管制计划， 难谈了，我说实在，今天呢，在稀土这件事情当中，不是光是稀土本身的问题，而是过去三十年对中国的打压结束了，那你接下去你要怎么样换到呢？夕谷的解禁。而且军民两用全面管制，你就算解禁了之后呢？你只要用在军用上头，可能你都要跟中国好好的估量好好的谈。不要忘了F35要用417公斤的稀土，这个涂装要用417公斤的重稀土才能够提炼出一次，因为他经常要涂装吗？对，他要反复的涂装。他只要一次飞行之后呢，那个表层的那个那个那个就是说涂装的都会呢，都会做那种呢都会减弱，所以他是要反复涂装的，一次就要417公斤，这一次的谈判，终究除了贝森特根格里尔之外，加了鲁特尼克，鲁特尼克，当然他，他们会不会又吵架？首先三个人说三个臭皮匠。我说三个和尚没水喝它摸着呗三个呢。我先说一下就是加入鲁特尼克当然是有必要的因为呢，鲁特尼克，他底下的那个安全局安全工业局，他是负责管制所有的出口产品，所以要解除出口，解除管制或者是增加管制，其实是鲁特尼克在负责，商务部在负责，美国财政部其实是管不了商务部的事情。宏贸易代表格利尔也也管不了这个鲁特尼克的事情。所以他如果要去谈管制产品的话，他就必须要有鲁特尼克来出马。但问题是，因为这两天日经新闻报道出来说，在美日谈判的时候，美国对日本谈判也是这三个人跟这个日本在谈判已经进入第五轮哦。那日本就很客气的说，啊，有进展啦，无共识有进展，没有共识。结果呢，发现这三个人就被森特鲁特尼克跟这个格里尔三个人就当着日方代表自己吵起来了，日方就不知所措，不知道该如何的去应对。因为他们三个就当着自己的面就这样吵起来。所以不知道这一次在对何立峰的时候，三个人的态度如何，我觉得也很值得观察。日本代表干嘛不可以应该说，哎，你，你们三个可不可以先谈好了，我们再再做，坐下来谈，这也说明了他们真的对任何一个国家谈判，事先是没有谈好的，本来就是他们没有统一策略耶。你光是从他4月2号解放日秀出来的那个看板，从公示到内容全部都都是错误的，然后他也把它当做是一个重大政策，就像推出来了，对，那你就是这三个这三个单位的讲法，对一个国家在谈一件事情的想法都不一样。基本上面试没有没有事前没有坐下来统合。因此呢，到底是谁在主导美国的对某个国家的特定谈判，大家是搞不清楚。英国很好，很好谈，是因为英国本来根本就不需要谈的，英国对美国是逆差国，谈什么呢？给你10%呢？是英国的很大的让步啊。但是其他的国家来讲，你要谈顺差可以啊，日本都说我愿意跟你跟你谈了，可是你们三个可不可以谈好？但是呢这种就是说明明呢，明明现现场有一个有一个真正的应该的主角，可是被晾在一边，在在美国这三个月里面层出不穷，不管是坐在川普旁旁旁边的梅洛妮。嗯，或者是呢，德国的总理或者是呢，马克坐在旁边呢，都像是空气一样。对对大家大家都问他们问题呢，都跟他们都没有关系，然后呢，就这样子晾着，你就知道。其实其实美国呢，现在的政府的运作是一个完全失控的状态，就是在跟你谈，什么时候呢？其实就是没有在跟你谈谈什么。谈半天之后你想今天我日本面对你们三个，老实讲这已经是福禄寿三千了，就是不给关，本来就是啊，就是美国的谈谈判，除了川普以外，最能够代表美国的三个人都都在现场，就福禄寿三这三千坐在我面前，可是我跟你任何人谈都没有用啊。因为我不知道你们之间呢，会有多深的矛盾，那你们不能先有了共识，或者有一个祖谭芳吗？因此，为什么跟中国谈很重要，你跟中国谈不定，你去跟这些国家谈干嘛呢？所以他现在一定要跟中国要有所突破。虽然这次何立峰，到英国留的时间还蛮多的，8号到13号，时间还蛮长的。但能不能够谈出结果，我基本上预留了，就是大概两天的时间，能不能谈出结果，那就看美国呢，要做多大的让步。因为我刚刚讲到了在瓦森纳协协议上面，美国在川普1.0特别放上去的时候，2019年把半导体全部放上去，适用瓦森纳协议的N 二代的规定。中国呢？没有参加瓦斯那些一个中国现在呢，完全符合瓦森纳协议，军民两用出口管制，那大家其实就谈这两件事情，老实讲其他的这些呢，进出口的问题，那都是边缘喔问题，半导体跟稀土，大家就来好好谈，那美国在这方面来来讲，一旦在瓦森纳协议当中的半导体出口，你一旦松动了之后。瓦森纳协议就垮了，对中国三十年的贸易封锁就结束了哈。那今天呢，美国今天的川普经不经得起这个跟1.0完全背道而驰的决定。

who loves America the most?

Would Donald Trump make strong president? he might be quite decisive but do I consider Donald Trump an ideal decision maker or manager of anything and the answer is no and the last person almost that I want to be president of the United states is Donald Trump. Really? Yes! Why? Well, I think he has qualities that make him unsuitable for the office . Those quality? Vain glory, puffery to too large an extent. I can go on and on. The tension in the CNN debate studio was thick enough to cut with a knife under the blazing studio lights 2 of America's most controversial political figures sat across from each other ready for what would become the most shocking political confrontation of 2025 Caroline Levitt the 27 year old former White House press secretary turned congressional candidate sat confidently in her signature Navy blazer blonde hair perfectly styled eyes sharp with the kind of ambition that had made for trump's youngest spokesperson across from her cash Patel the 45 year old former FBI director nominee and son of Indian immigrants adjusted his tie with the calm precision of a man who had spent years in the intelligence community what happened in the next 30 seconds would send shockwaves across America and change both of their political careers forever Mr. Patel Levitt began her voice carrying that familiar edge that had made her famous during White House briefings maybe it's time you stopped pretending to understand American values and went back to India where you belong the words hung in the air like a bomb waiting to explode studio audience gasped CNN anchor Anderson Cooper's eyes widened in disbelief social media would later call it the most racist comment ever made on live television by a major political figure but Cash patel's response nobody saw it coming what he said next didn't just destroy levitt's political career that exposed the truth about America that left the entire nation speechless before we dive into this incredible story hit that like button and subscribe so you don't miss any of the explosive political drama we cover trust me you won't want to miss what happens next this wasn't just another political debate this was the moment when America's ugly truths collided with its highest ideals live on national television and by the end of this confrontation one career would be over one would be transformed and the entire country would be talking about what it really means to be American to understand how we got to this explosive moment, you need to know who these two people really are and why this debate mattered so much to America's future at just 27 Caroline Levitt had already conquered political heights that most people never reach in their entire careers, born and raised in New Hampshire she came from a working class, catholic family that taught her the value of hard work and conservative principles, after graduating from Saint Anselm college, She landed a job in Trump’s white house communications team. When she bearly 24 years old. Levitt quickly made a name for herself as one of trump's most fierce defenders. Her youth combined with her sharp tongue and unwavering loyalty made her immediate darling among conservatives when trump needed someone who could handle hostile press conferences and never backed down from a fight. He chose Levitt as the youngest White House press secretary in American history. But levitt's rise wasn't without controversy critics called her trump's attack dog pointing to her history of inflammatory statements and her willingness to say whatever it took to defend her boss her supporters saw her as a breath of fresh air a young woman who wasn't afraid to stand up to the liberal media establishment after leaving the White House Levitt set her sights on Congress running for New Hampshire's first district on a platform of America first policies and traditional values she positioned herself as the future of the conservative movement the one who would carry trump's torch into the next generation. Cash Patel's story was quintessentially American even though Levitt would try to use it against him. Born to parents who immigrated from India in the 1970s Patel grew up in New York watching his father work multiple jobs to provide for his family his parents had come to America with nothing but dreams and a work ethic that would make their son proud Patel excelled in school earning a law degree and eventually working his way up through the Department of Justice he served as a prosecutor going after terrorists and drug cartels putting his life on the line for his adopted country. When Trump came to power Patel became one of his most trusted advisors on national security matters as a senior official in the trump administration Patel was known for his intelligence his loyalty and his ability to get things done he played key roles in counter terrorism operations and was instrumental in exposing what trump called the deep state conspiracy against his presidency trump trusted Patel so much that he nominated him to lead the FBI though the nomination faced fierce opposition from Democrats who saw him as too loyal to trump unlike many politicians Patel had actually put his life on the line for America he had worked undercover operations had been threatened by terrorists and had spent years in the intelligence community protecting American lives his record of service was impeccable but to some his Indian heritage made him an easy target this CNN debate wasn't just about two political careers it was happening at a crucial moment in American politics when questions about immigration identity and what it means to be truly American we're dividing the country Levitt represented a wing of the conservative movement that believed America was losing its identity she spoke for millions of Americans who felt that their country was changing too fast that traditional values were under attack and that only people with deep American roots could truly understand what the country needed Patel represented something different the American dream in action he was proof that immigrants could become some of America's most dedicated patriots that love of country wasn't determined by how many generations your family had been here but by your willingness to serve and sacrifice for American ideals this India debate was supposed to focus on national security policy an area where both had expertise leave it had been trump's spokesperson during major international crises while Patel had actually been in the room making life and death decisions about America's safety but as the cameras rolled in the questions began it became clear that this would be about much more than policy this would be about the soul of America itself CNN had billed it as the future of conservative politics featuring 2 rising stars who represented different visions for where the Republican Party should go the network expected fireworks but nobody anticipated what was about to happen the stage was set. Two ambitious politicians each representing a different vision of America sitting across from each other under the brightest lights in the country one would walk away victorious the other would have their career destroyed by their own words what happened next would force America to confront some uncomfortable truths about itself the debate started normally enough Anderson Cooper CNN's veteran anchor opened with questions about border security and National Defence safe territory for both candidates for the first 20 minutes Levitt and Patel traded policy positions like seasoned professionals Levitt advocated for strict immigration controls and accused the Biden administration of weakening America's borders we need leaders who understand that America must come first. She said her voice was confident and clear. Our citizens deserve to know that their government is working for them not for people who have no right to be here. Patel responded with his typical measured tone outlining specific policies while drawing on his experience in law enforcement I've spent my career actually catching the bad guys he said calmly I've worked undercover to stop drug cartels and terrorists I know the difference between real threats and political talking points the first sign of trouble came when Cooper asked about the trump administration's immigration policies Levitt immediately went on the attack suggesting that some trump officials hadn't been tough enough on immigration enforcement we need people in government who truly understand American values Levitt said her eyes flashing toward Patel people whose loyalty to this country can never be questioned. Patel raised an eyebrow but maintained his composure I think my record speaks for itself he replied I've risked my life for this country more than once I've put terrorists in prison and helped keep Americans safe if that's not loyalty I don't know what it is but Levitt wasn't backing down she had come to this debate with a strategy and she was determined to execute it regardless of the consequences it's easy to claim loyalty she shot back but real Americans don't need to prove their patriotism. It's in their blood. The phrase real Americans hung in the air like a warning shot. Cooper shifted uncomfortably in his chair sensing that the debate was heading into dangerous territory in the control room CNN producers began to worry about where this was going patel's jaw tightened slightly but his voice remained steady miss Levitt I hope you're not suggesting that American citizenship is determined by ancestry rather than values and service I am suggesting, Levitt replied her voice getting sharper that some people understand America instinctively while others have to learn it from books the audience in the studio began to murmur this was getting personal and everyone could feel it on social media viewers were already starting to take sides with hashtags like Warner real Americans and immigrant pride beginning to trend Cooper tried to steer the conversation back to policy asking about specific border security measures but Levitt had tasted blood and she wasn't going to let this opportunity slip away she had clearly decided that the best way to defeat Patel was to question his fundamental right to speak for America. Mr. Patel talks a good game about American values she continued but when push comes to shove where do his loyalties really lie when he looks in the mirror does he see an American or does he see something else the studio fell silent this was no longer a policy debate this was a direct attack on patel's identity and belonging in America Cooper looked stunned clearly struggling with whether to intervene or let this play out Patel's supporters watching at home felt their hearts sink they had seen this before the subtle and not so subtle suggestions that Americans with immigrant backgrounds could never be real Americans no matter how much they achieved or sacrificed but Patel himself remained calm almost eerily so he looked directly at Levitt with the kind of steady gaze that had intimidated terrorists an interrogation rooms. Miss Levitt he said quietly I think you should be very careful about the road you're going down levitt either didn't hear the warning in his voice or chose to ignore it she had committed to this strategy and she was going to see it through to the end. I think you should be very careful about the road you're going down. Levitt either didn't hear the warning in his voice or chose to ignore it she had committed to this strategy and she was going to see it through to the end. Mr. Patel you've served in government and I respect that but there's a difference between serving America and truly understanding America , some of us were born with that understanding others she paused dramatically others will always trying to prove they belong. The insult was clear even if the words were carefully chosen. Levit was suggesting that Pathel despite his years of years of service and sacrifice could never be a real American because of his immigrant background Patel nodded slowly as if he had been expecting this moment all along I see he said calmly so you believe that American identity is determined by ancestry rather than actions that's an interesting position for someone who claims to support constitutional values I believe Levitt replied her voice rising that America should be led by Americans who don't need to prove their loyalty because it's never been in question the crowd was getting restless now some people were cheering levitt's boldness while others were clearly uncomfortable with the direction of the conversation Cooper was frantically getting instructions through his earpiece with CNN executives unsure whether to cut to commercial or let this explosive moment continue that when Patel did something unexpected instead of getting angry or defensive he smiled it was a calm confident smile that suggested he knew something that nobody else in the room knew miss Levitt he said his voice taking on a different tone since you want to talk about who really belongs in America let me tell you a story it's about my family and it's about yours and by the time I'm done I think everyone watching will understand exactly who deserves to question whose loyalty to this country levitt's confidence faltered for just a moment something in patel's tone suggested that he wasn't about to roll over and take her attacks in fact it sounded like he had been preparing for this moment his entire career you see Patel continued his voice growing stronger I've spent years in the intelligence community I know how to research people I know how to find information and before I came here tonight I did a little research on you miss Levitt what I found was very very interesting the studio fell completely silent even the camera operators stopped moving everyone sensed that something big was about to happen levitt's face had gone pale she clearly hadn't expected Patel to fight back with information of his own I don't know what you think you found she said but her voice had lost its earlier confidence patel's smile widened ohh I think you know exactly what I found but don't worry I'm going to share it with everyone and that's when kash Patel dropped a bombshell that would change everything cash Patel leaned forward in his chair his hands folded calmly in front of him the studio lights seemed to focus on him as he prepared to deliver what would become one of the most devastating political comebacks in American history miss Levitt he began his voice carrying the authority of someone who had spent years briefing presidents and hunting terrorists you just told me to go back to India you suggested that I'm not a real American you questioned my loyalty to this country he paused letting the weight of her words sink in with the audience but before we talk about who belongs in America let me share some facts with the American people facts that I think they deserve to know Levitt shifted uncomfortably in her seat the confidence she had shown just moments earlier was evaporating as she realised that Patel wasn't going to simply absorb her attack you see Patel continued when you work in intelligence you learn to verify everything so when I heard that I would be debating Caroline Levitt tonight I did what any good investigator would do I checked the facts about both of our families he reached into his jacket and pulled out a folder this is public information available to anyone who cares to look but I suspect most Americans don't know the real story of the Levitt family history the camera zoomed in on the folder as Patel opened it deliberately CNN producers were frantically trying to decide whether to intervene but the ratings were skyrocketing as viewers across the country sensed they were witnessing something historic let's start with my family Patel said calmly my parents came to America in 1970 with nothing but hope and determination my father worked three jobs as a taxi driver during the day a security guard at night and a janitor on weekends my mother cleaned office buildings and took care of other people's children his voice remained steady but there was emotion behind it they didn't come here for government handouts or special treatment they came here because they believed in the American dream the idea that if you work hard and follow the rules you can build a better life for your children he looked directly at Levitt my father never took a penny of welfare never asked for special treatment never expected America to owe him anything he just worked and saved and sent me to school with the money he earned with his own hands the studio was completely silent now even levitt's supporters were listening intently when i was old enough to serve my country patel continued i didn't hesitate i became a prosecutor putting criminals in prison i worked undercover to catch drug dealers and terrorists. Arrests I risked my life in operations that I still can't talk about because they're classified he paused his eyes never leaving levitt's face I've been shot at by terrorists I've been threatened by drug cartels I've spent nights in foreign countries where being discovered would have meant death all to protect American lives the emotion in his voice was growing stronger now so when miss Levitt questions my loyalty to America when she tells me to go back to India she's not just insulting me she's insulting every immigrant family that has ever sacrificed for this country she's insulting every American whose parents came here seeking a better life applause began to ripple through parts of the audience but Patel held up his hand but I'm not done yet because the really interesting part isn't my family's story it's hers levitt's face went white she clearly hadn't expected this Patel opened the folder and pulled out several documents you see miss Levitt loves to talk about being a real American whose family has deep roots in this country she's built her entire political identity around the idea that she represents authentic American values he held up the first document but according to public records the Levitt family immigrated to America in 1892 that's right Caroline Levitt is a third generation immigrant just like millions of other Americans the audience began to murmur this wasn't what anyone had expected but here's where it gets really interesting Patel continued his voice taking on the tone of a prosecutor presenting evidence to a jury the Levitt family came here from wait for it Canada he paused for effect that's right folks the woman who just told me to go back to India is herself the descendant of Canadian immigrants who came to America looking for economic opportunities the murmuring in the audience grew louder some people began to laugh at the irony but wait there's more Patel said clearly enjoying himself now according to immigration records caroline's great grandfather Thomas Levitt was actually refused entry to the United states twice before finally being admitted on his third attempt Levitt tried to interrupt this is ridiculous you can't compare oh but I can Patel cut her off smoothly because you see Thomas Levitt was rejected because immigration officials were concerned about his ability to support himself in America he had no money no job prospects and no guarantees he looked directly at the camera in other words Thomas Levitt was exactly the kind of immigrant that his great granddaughter now wants to keep out of America the audience erupted some people were cheering others were laughing and a few were clearly uncomfortable with this turn of events Patel wasn't finished but here's my favorite part of the Levitt family story Thomas levitt's immigration petition was actually sponsored by an Indian American businessman who had made his fortune in the textile industry the studio fell silent again as the full impact of this revelation sank in that's right Patel said his voice rising now caroline levitt's family was only able to come to america because an indian immigrant vouched for them and helped them get his voice rising now Caroline levitt's family was only able to come to America because an Indian immigrant vouched for them and helped them get established he turned to face Levitt directly so when you tell me to go back to India you're literally telling the descendant of the people who helped your family come to America to leave the country that we both call home the irony was so perfect so complete that even some of levitt's supporters in the audience began to shake their heads in disbelief but Patel wasn't done delivering his knockout punch miss Levitt he said his voice now carrying the full authority of his years in law enforcement you want to talk about real Americans let me tell you what real Americans do he stood up his presence commanding the entire studio real Americans don't judge people by the color of their skin or the country their grandparents came from real Americans judge people by their character their actions and their service to others his voice was rising with passion now real Americans don't tell other Americans to go back where they came from especially when their own families came from somewhere else too he pointed directly at Leavitt real Americans don't build their careers on dividing people and spreading hate real Americans build their careers on bringing people together and serving their country the audience was on its feet now many people applauding loudly even some of the camera operators were nodding in agreement you want to know the difference between us miss Levitt Patel asked his voice now thundering through the studio my family came to America with nothing and gave everything to this country your family came to America with nothing and apparently taught their descendants to look down on other people who did the same thing he paused writing his words sink in I've spent my entire adult life serving America as a prosecutor as an intelligence officer as a public servant you've spent your career serving Donald Trump and your own political ambitions the contrast was stark and devastating so before you ever again question anyone's loyalty to America Patel concluded his voice dropping to a whisper that somehow carried throughout the entire studio you might want to look in the mirror and ask yourself what you've actually done to make this country better he sat back down folded his hands and looked calmly at Anderson Cooper I believe you had a question about border security the studio erupted in applause even some of the CNN crew were clapping Levitt sat in her chair her face red with embarrassment and anger clearly unable to formulate a response to the devastating takedown she had just received Cooper professional that he was tried to restore order to the debate but everyone knew that the real drama was over cash Patel had just delivered one of the most perfect political comebacks in American history using levitt's own family history to expose the hypocrisy of her attack as the applause finally died down Patel looked directly into the camera and said America is great because we welcome people who want to work hard and contribute to our society regardless of where they came from that's what makes us different from every other country in the world and anyone who tries to divide us based on our origins doesn't understand what America is really about the message was clear powerful and undeniably American and in that moment kash Patel didn't just win a debate he reminded the entire country what it really means to be American the immediate aftermath of cash patel's devastating response was unlike anything CNN had ever experienced within seconds of his final statement social media exploded in a way that political observers had never seen before before Anderson Cooper could even wrap up the debate mundane cash destroys Caroline was trending #1 on Twitter the video clip of patel's response was being shared faster than the platform servers could process it conservative commentator Ben Shapiro who rarely praised anyone outside his own ideological circle tweeted holy shut I've never seen a more perfect political takedown in my life Cash Patel just schooled everyone on what American values actually mean liberal commentator van Jones usually a harsh critic of trump associated figures posted I disagreed with Patel on policy but what he just did was pure American greatness sometimes truth transcends politics the memes started flowing immediately the most popular showed a photo of Patel calmly sitting with his folder while Levitt looked panicked captioned when you come to a fact fight with talking points another showed the Statue of Liberty giving a thumbs up with the text immigrants schooling racists since 1886 but the most powerful posts weren't memes they were personal stories thousands of Americans began sharing their own immigration stories many starting with my family came here from followed by tales of sacrifice hard work and love of country the political implications were immediate and far reaching within hours major republican figures were forced to choose sides in a way that revealed deep fractures within the conservative movement senator Ted Cruz himself the son of an immigrant tweeted cash Patel just reminded us all what conservative values really mean character matters more than ancestry service matters more than heritage Florida governor Ron de santis clearly trying to navigate the controversy carefully posted America has always been strengthened by legal immigrants who embrace our values and contribute to our society but perhaps the most surprising response came from Donald Trump himself known for his loyalty to his former staff trump found himself in an impossible position Levitt had been one of his most faithful defenders but Patel had also been a trusted adviser trump's response posted to truth social 3 hours after the debate was characteristically unpredictable cash Patel is a Great American and a true patriot he served our administration with honor and distinction some people need to learn the difference between America first and America only we welcome legal immigrants who love our country the statement was widely interpreted as trump throwing Levitt under the bus while embracing Patel a stunning reversal for someone who usually stood by his people no matter what major news outlets struggled to process what they had witnessed Fox News usually friendly to trump aligned figures like Levitt found themselves in an awkward position Tucker Carlson often criticized for his own comments about immigration surprised everyone with his response on his show the next night what cash Patel did last night wasn't just good television Carlson said it was a master class in American values when someone attacks you for your background you don't respond with anger you respond with facts with service and with dignity that's what winners do CNN's ratings for the debate broke records becoming the most watched political program in the network's history Anderson Cooper reflecting on the moment during the next day's broadcast said in 30 years of journalism I've never seen anything like what kash Patel did last night he turned what could have been a moment of division into a lesson what unites us as Americans even international media took notice the BBC's headline read american debate shows how immigrants often understand democracy better than native born citizens the times of india proudly proclaimed indian american shows america how to win with for Caroline Levitt the aftermath was a political disaster of epic proportions by the morning after the debate three major donors had pulled their support from her congressional campaign her campaign manager resigned citing fundamental disagreements about strategy and messaging the New Hampshire Republican Party which had previously endorsed her candidacy issued a carefully worded statement distancing themselves from her comments the New Hampshire Republican Party believes that American values are not determined by ancestry but by character and service to country more damaging were the defections from her own staff her communications director press secretary and deputy campaign manager all resigned within 48 hours with several citing their own immigrant backgrounds as factors in their decisions Levitt attempted damage control with a series of tweets and a hastily arranged press conference but nothing could undo the damage her explanation that she had been taken out of context rang hollow when the entire exchange was available on video I never meant to suggest that Mister Patel wasn't American she claimed at her press conference I was simply trying to highlight the difference between those who understand American culture instinctively and those who have had to learn it the explanation only made things worse as critics pointed out that she was still suggesting there were different levels of americanness based on family history for cash Patel the debate transformed him from a respected but relatively unknown former government official into a national conservative hero speaking requests poured in from across the country book publishers reached out about autobiography deals political operatives began floating his name for higher office but perhaps more importantly Patel had achieved something rare in modern politics he had managed to unite people across party lines around a shared vision of American values his response to Levitt was studied in political science classes as an example of how to respond to attacks with grace and effectiveness communications experts praised his use of facts his emotional authenticity and his ability to turn a negative moment into a positive message about America the debate had implications far beyond the two participants patel's response forced a broader conversation about immigration and American identity that many politicians had been avoiding immigration advocacy groups seized on patel's words as a perfect example of how immigrants often have a deeper appreciation for American values than those who take them for granted conservative groups found themselves in the unusual position of defending an immigration narrative that emphasized contribution over restriction the debate also highlighted the complexity of modern American identity millions of Americans saw themselves in both patel's story of immigrant success and levitt's appeal to traditional American values forcing a more nuanced conversation about what it means to belong in America in the months following the debate political analysts identified it as a turning point in how conservatives talk about immigration and American identity the old model of US versus them rhetoric became much more difficult to sustain when the them included people like cash Patel who had clearly sacrificed more for America than many of the people questioning their loyalty republican primary candidates across the country found themselves being asked the Patel question how they would respond to attacks on the americanness of legal immigrants who had served their country with distinction the debate also marked the beginning of the end for levitt's political career she would eventually withdraw from the congressional race citing family considerations though everyone understood that her candidacy had become untenable after the debate perhaps the most important outcome of the debate was the message it sent about American values in the 21st century patel's response reminded the country that America's strength has always come from its ability to welcome people who are willing to work hard and contribute to society regardless of where they came from his calm factual response to a racist attack showed that the best way to combat division is not with anger or defensiveness but with truth dignity and an unwavering commitment to the values that make America great as one viral tweet put it kash Patel just showed America how to win an argument without losing your soul the story of cash patel's triumph over Caroline levitt's attack became more than just a political moment it became the template for how Americans should respond when faced with attempts to divide them based on ancestry or background in the end the debate proved that America's greatest strength isn't its military or its economy it's its ability to create Americans out of people from anywhere in the world who are willing to embrace American values and contribute to American success if this story inspired you like it inspired millions of Americans make sure to hit that subscribe button and share this video with everyone you know this is exactly the kind of political courage and American spirit that we need more of in our country let us know in the comments what you thought of kash patel's incredible response and don't forget to check out there are other videos about the real heroes who are fighting for America's future the lesson was clear in America your worth isn't determined by where your grandparents came from it's determined by what you're willing to do for the country you call home and sometimes it takes an immigrant son to remind the rest of us what that really means.