Kishore Mahbubani Speech

Distinguished Fellow at the Asia Research Institute (ARI), National University of Singapore(NUS): Kishore Mahbubani Ladies and gentlemen it is truly a great honor to be recognized for my efforts to promote the greater understanding of China in the global community I'm truly sorry that I cannot be there in person with you today to celebrate this award.sadly prior commitments have prevented me from joining you The need to develop a better understanding of China in our global community especially in the West, has never been greater. The return of China, the world’s oldest continuous civilization is a perfectly natural development. It’s an undeniable fact that from the year one to the year 1820. The two largest global economies were always those of China and India, so the real aberration in human history, was the past 200 years of western domination. All aberrations come to a natural end. This explains the natural resurgence of China, India and the other great Asian society. Sadly, western leaders and policymakers exactly and policymakers have not prepared themselves, intellectually and emotionally to accept the ancient 21st century that is unfolding before our eyes. Fortunately most of the 88% of the world that lives outside the West accept this. Most societies in the world especially in Asia have had strong relations with China for centuries, if not millennia; hence the deep respect for the deep pools of wisdom in Chinese civilization. By sharing its wisdom, China is helping us to create a better world for humanity This is why the greatest global imperative today is to promote a deeper understanding of China even a brief study of the history of China with this record of zero overseas colonial expansion, could help American policymakers lay to rest their deep fear that China is threatening America. It isn’t. Instead, China's willingness to work with America and other global power to address pressing global challenges, should be seen as a massive opportunity to create a better world for humanity which now shares a community of common destiny for mankind. With this award in hand I will redouble my personal effort to promote a better understanding of China; like the late Ezra Vogel, a good friend of mine, who received a similar award. I wanted to echo what he said,and I quote “I'm deeply moved to be recognized in China as one who is seriously endeavored to interpret China to the West. 2 Seems to have civil war 1949 so my first question is people are so interested in maybe curious like why did you think of for and what you think about playing such a key role because regulations it's because of Chinese heritage report type number one very historic i must say you know many people in the world future especially on the national relations then you have a meeting that brings in our sunshine into the world so with the meeting between she Jinping and why in June is going to bring a lot of sunshine in the world because it shows that you can have a very intractable problem like the one cross the Taiwan straits and many people have given up hope and you could have happened and now you can hear demonstrating that we can take an intractable problem and try to resolve so I give a lot of credit to both teaching the pleasure of meeting in person hmm and that's about singapore's role I think it's a very complicated story I think it started with the role of Mr. Lee kwan you after whom I was school is named because I think Mr. liquor knew was a good friend of the leaders of China and a good friend the leaders of Taiwan and so as a result of that he developed the trust of both the leaders and therefore it's quite natural that the first ever meeting with China and Iran took place in Singapore over 20 years ago and since then Singapore has maintained its position of trust with both countries and therefore when the time came for a higher level meeting was perfectly natural so as you mentioned this truly ponyo is a leader that highly respected among the world community so actually when talking about this Xi Jinping online just meeting this time many people across both sides across street will think about 1993 that's a very important from coming here yeah so this really ponyo was very important at that time so he actually attributed to that historical meaning and that was the groundbreaking meeting at that time so why was this her late from you so concerned about cross what was his explanation I think of course was very concerned about primarily about the development of Singapore but he saw that singapore's future was tied to what happened to the region at large also what happened to the major powers in the region and as you know in around that time sometimes relations between US and China will go up and down and one of the core issues in the US China relationship was the question about what to do what I want and there was even a danger and war breaking out so go last week to avoid a wall of conflict or tension in the United States and China was to find Ways and Means of diffusing the Taiwan issue I think we have accomplished that starting of course from the meeting in Singapore there are lots of other factors at play obviously but often the most difficult step as you know the when you take a journey of 1000 miles the first step is very important exactly so we are 1000 mile journey and you see that haven't got there by the way this meeting not everything but you certainly changed the chemistry and demosphere significantly but you would have to start the process on the road and that was the contribution that Mister so many people have so much many expectations on this xinping among this meeting for example in Taiwan people mentioned that if there is a possibility that it touched the issue like China might be considering the possibility of withdrawing missile and the Taiwan or letting Taiwan has more room participating in the international organization so in your personal perspective do you think that this meeting is more symbolic than substantial or actually we can really touch something substantial I'm learning diplomacy that symbolism and substance school can I mean for example if symbolically I'll give you a very dramatic example there was a time when in theory The United states recognized Taiwan as a legitimate government of China mainland China was considered illegal OK and then Henry Kissinger yeah that was 1972 that was never symbolic meeting substantive ohh OK symbolic meaning showing that a major change I've taken place Clear Lake to very substantive changes and the eventual recognition of mainland China by the United states America so essentially number that that's an example of how symbolism and substance called so in the meeting dress and she and lying doing Singapore there will be a lot of symbolism if that leads to greater trust and understanding and clearly things are greater space for firewall in terms of participation in international organizations in fact I was in Taiwan having a meeting we are either lying you on the day when China gave their agreement that Taiwan could participate in the World Health Organization wow amazing so I've I've seen our history has changed within China and Taiwan and I also believe by the way very important we emphasize this in international relations you take 2 steps forward sometimes you take one step back still moving OK and I think the long term trend can continue to be positive within China this time in Taiwan some people are concerned about the negative effect of this meeting for example like DPP the opposite party in Taiwan the chairman of this timing word who might be the next president of Taiwan because this front runner of the pole right so she is kind of concerned that the meeting will be like a friend to limit the future development of the crash rates because the one China policy now China conducts it's not like totally accepted by the hotel people how do you see from that I'm not gonna come in sure is that the Singapore politics but I I do believe that even if you are with the DPP you have to deal with international realities you cannot change international reality when you change political parties OK and China's standing in the world you so you have to much more powerful in 1980 in P terms China's GDP was less than 10% of United States today PPP terms Chinese GNP is bigger and you had States and in 15 years time you may be twice the size of the United states this is a new reality so no matter what party you come for you have to deal with this reality and every bridge that is built within China and Taiwan but help the people of hi this sense in the long run I believe that even the DP would have to be realistic and acknowledged that the world has changed OK so Singapore is the small country but it's very influential and very powerful around the world among the world so compared to Taiwan Taiwan is small but we also want to be powerfully so the Singapore experience and the single module what will be your suggestions to town one that we can learn or borrow from your experience you know I gave a lecture to the students of the liquid new school of public policy in which I give away the secrets of Singapore success and I bought it down to a three word formula let it docs pragmatism honesty meritocracy is about serving the best people who run your government pragmatism is always about being realistic and adjusting your policies to deal with real world and honestly meaning there should be no corruption and in the area of international relations no country in the world has been more pragmatic than singaporeans we accept the fact that is a small country we have to we have price takes you know price makers even international relations change we have to change and adjust so if we try to go against international reality it's about taking your head and knocking against a brick wall different so I noticed that the culture of pragmatism hasn't become as strong as it should be and I would recommend you bring it back that this is. Jan Oberg Political science academic, peace researcher, the director of Transnational Foundation for Peace & Future Research He probably doesn't like imagine I mean I it's not completely comparable but imagine that China was obsessed with farming away to become an independent state I wonder how Washington would we have to something like that I'm a PhD in sociology from way back in time at the university in South Sweden so I'm a social scientist and I have specialized all my academic life on peace studies that is a branch of social studies where we deal with reducing violence exactly as a doctor reduces diseases if he or she can and then disseminating this through research public outreach and activities on the ground I worked in a lot of war zones invite to heal wounds afterwards it's always very difficult to find in reality we've we beneath those types of personal meetings my quick reading on CNN and BBC and others are what happened yesterday was benevolent Chinese president to emphasize cooperation who emphasize that we must solve humanities problems together etcetera and abiding who if he's clear in his brain for some short. And tries to say the same the whole immediately after he gets a question at the press conference do you still think that she Jinping the Chinese president would you still call him a dictator well I think it was fully nice here's I spent more than 60 hours with the Chinese president and yes I would and the answer is why and the question is from Biden because he runs a communist country that is different from ours dude you thought you were intellectual level that somebody who writes a punch you according to different principles definition the dictator I mean if you think somebody is a dictator you will treat that person his country in a different way from if you think he's just a different kind of leader from us but he's OK The United States of America and much of the Christian world cannot live without without somebody who is different threatening non believers don't do what we tell them to do and who do not accept mission so I believe that that has been speed up let's say since the last five to 10 years if I give you an example I think is now five years ago that the Congress passed a law and listen carefully a law which set off 1500 million dollars $1.5 billion / 5 years to train western journalists in writing negative stories about China I started done by the state agency or media in the United states now those of us who go to China or westerners who live here and see the complexities and the brothers and try to understand China and Chinese premises see it differently but that is where they are they need desperately to have enemies and if you don't have enemies and I don't see anything in China's foreign policy that is a threat to the United states it is not China that has its vessels outside California's coast or florida's coast it is the West that has all these vessels around China and the alphas all cooperation with Australia and the submarines that are there and they're Germans were in the in the in your waters or really international waters around you too and the Taiwan issue I don't see China doing these things to the West imagine I mean I it's not completely comparable but imagine that China was obsessed with arming away to become an independent state I wonder how Washington would character something like that and therefore you invent you are enemies if you want enemies it's easier to make it you know how Russia you're not part of the African world and it's the global S you have China that you declare don't follow us are different from us think differently and therefore they are our enemies this is very dangerous and very sad because we could thanks so much for working together and I can still only hope that there will be somebody who comes to their senses and it will not be viable and it will not be trump and change America from the inside because the moment America with all its resources creativity and ideas and history and knowledge the door to become apparently in the world not somebody who insist on dominating over everybody else there will be much better place than the United states will be a much better place so I'm looking for a peaceful revolution where the Americans will arise to say enough is enough with your empire and militaries we want a good society here and we want to be friends well the only candidate who say that at the moment is Robert Kennedy junior Robert F Kennedy junior but it remains to be seen whether he will have a chance to become a president I doubt it but we'll see well if you look at what I would call the social cosmology of the West it's very much made-up of centerpiece one God one kings either or thinking male or female left or right not both end all of it is handicapped by being a culture of mission or missionary you have the French word civilizational Michael simplicity is the idea that we are supposed has #1 bold you remember it was one called the first word of the Second World the third world and the 4th world that by the first one there's this idea that we shall all move up to become like the West Europe and the United and that idea of course is everywhere willing colonialists at times in Africa or elsewhere but the liberation movements in the 60s they said we do not want to be we don't want to have your system whether it's Christianity or it's your way of thinking of human rights or whatever and you have the same question here in in China with the opening up of Nixon and Jewelers and meeting via the collection of chess freeman and Kissinger that the hope was that if we open up to China we will actually change two things one we will see to it that China and Russia will not be the ganging up against us we will split you and secondly we hope China will go our way become a multi party system where the capitalist economy and they'll be like us this be like us is over this would be like also become like us is over and that's what the Americans cannot understand they still believe that they have to lead the world is must be led by the Americans and the reason they can't see it and they are in denial is that it's going down not the US state or society but as an empire and all empires go down there's no empire that hasn't existed forever so you may say the United states today is Titanic the West is sitting as restaurants in Titanic and the water is coming up around the windows now instead of them reaching out and say OK our time is over we will be one among many and we will cooperate with you what they do is they insist on one thing and that is to dominate by means of deception the Americans don't do diplomacy diplomacy anymore they sent weapons and pouring weapons because that's what they are best at but no country can survive with just being strong in one sense for instance military if you become politically weak you become economically weak you become psychologically weak you become weak in terms of international law and legitimacy then you are on your way down a strong country is 1 which has high level on all power indicators and do not over militarize and neglect the other power scales the United states has you can say being that military industrial media academic complex these are in needs who have common interests with each other such as producing weapons selling weapons using weapons destroying countries rebuilding countries again but they do not have any common interest with the people in their countries outside democratic control and who said that possible Dwight D Eisenhower in 1960 or one or two whenever he made his farewell speech it's a very famous speech by a man who was a general himself who set the United states has developed a military industrial complex he didn't call it remark as I do and we need to put it in the control to remain a democracy what is undermined very very clearly now is pluralist open media and our democracy in the West because everything is now geared to warfarin militarism more more more there's nobody who stops to think there's nobody who stops to think about the long term consequences of pouring in weapons and never solving the conflicts you just look at what goes on now and you smell the country that had so much weaponry already had nuclear weapons have had a special agreement with weapons for the United states $5 billion a year I don't know for how many is what is the first reaction in Washington we must transfer each transfer even more as to Israel this is a sick society it's a sick way of thinking and of course this whole thing has to do with as I said before the brown the unrealistic dream illusion that if we can get rid of Russia as an opponent and we could we created that opponent ourselves because they're never invaded a NATO country they hope that they can concentrate all natural resources on a Cold War or God forbid a hot war against China you just got to later front page and you look at these threat perception nature is not characterized to be something like a church you either believe in this nonsense or you don't there's never an argument for natural language the text is China is a threat or a challenge because China is different from us China has different interests from us in the West now if that's how you define a threat, anybody around the world basically is right so the whole thing is the military industrial complex lives from finding enemies because if you don't have enemies or say you have enemies or point somebody or make enemies you can't legitimate your own arms development and the military industrial media academic complex will fall apart. Long story short here I think is that I wouldn't trust that the Americans are going to change much unless there is a people's revolution and nonviolent not the stupid thing that that we saw on 6th of January 2 years ago but if there is an uprising in the United states saying no more militarism we want a good society here we want cooperation will China and everybody else in the world we need to cooperate to solve managers and my mental problems poverty problems infrastructure problems all these things we're wasting every hour for humanities and our children's future by militarism and warfare now I know that China is the second largest military power on earth and it has nuclear weapons I have a problem with that but that's my problem story short is that China wants cooperation it works in Belton Rd. initiative it won't keep good for relationship with the US you're welcome do things we don't like in the West but is not a reason to have a Cold War against it it's a reason to talk with so therefore these meetings are important but we need much more dialogue in terms of online thinking we need in NGO's working together we need cultural people working together in parenthesis I'm also not photographer and trying to do an exhibition in China about dialogue and those types of things that can soften the hardliners undermine the hardware school and if you ask me Taiwan it's all simple it's China it's tall and it's very clear in the communication between July and Nixon I think it's #12 is a very large document very clearly saying the United states will not interfere in this issue and so we have a one China policy it does all the things that you can do in Taiwan and I have a huge problem with that I'm not going to talk about saying that in the West but if we keep on doing this we can only hope that China will be patient enough for long enough for the United states to sink on its own in that destructive self militarization but I would wish as somebody who has never hated the US I've never been anti US or mentally American as they say and the column for them you know I work with American scholars every day that the United states will come to its senses and begin to see itself as one partner of the world and not a dominator and imperialist and militarist I think it's possible possibility of rising from below in the western world and say enough is enough I'm looking for democracy to work that way you're not looking for Biden or or plump think Logan changed the system we need a system change in the West well they can't be peace in the world without the two biggest countries in the economy is working together again I would have hoped that the European Union would be helpful the European Union could have been in the way between Americans hardline anti China policies on China but with from the lion obviously being more or less you know propagator of Washington having no independent mind or thinking of the ocean union with Mr. Burrell who's basically a racist remember his statement about the paradise in Europe and the jungle outside that is dangerous there's not much out there either I was unbeliever in the European Union because I thought it could be another West with the more intelligent dialogue policies east West North and South than the empire over there were in Washington was but I was wrong so I'm not hearing optimistic on the short run in the long run I'm optimistic because the day the US empire has fallen nature wouldn't fall apart there's no NATO without US leadership militarism to create a multipolar peaceful cooperative world I hope I live long enough to see that materialize.

中吉号

泡一泡好茶 On May 20, 1947, the Nationalist Government revised the total number of casualties of the War of Resistance announced in 1946, with 3,227,926 military casualties, 422,479 military deaths due to illness, and 9,134,569 civilian casualties, for a total of 12,784,974 casualties. After the founding of the People's Republic of China, a preliminary estimate of the losses caused to China by Japan's invasion of China was 10 million people and more than $50 billion in property losses. On 7/4/1946 full independence was granted by United States, they elected the first president First Opium War, armed conflict in 1839–42 between China’s Qing dynasty and Britain over the dynasty’s restrictions on British trade and, more broadly, Britain’s dissatisfaction with its diplomatic relationship with the Qing. The catalyst for the conflict was the dynasty’s efforts to suppress the smuggling of opium into China by British traders. The result of the conflict was a British victory and the signing of the Treaty of Nanjing, the first of the unequal treaties imposed by Western powers upon the Qing. The conflict and its aftermath helped weaken that dynasty, which would be replaced by a republic in the early 20th century. Prelude to war How did people respond to To Kill a Mockingbird? How did people respond to To Kill a Mockingbird? Learn about the top questions and answers concerning the First and Second Opium Wars. See all videos for this article The First Opium War stemmed from Qing distrust of Western powers and from Western powers’ unhappiness with the limits that the Qing imposed on their trade with China. In 1757 the Qianlong emperor (reigned 1735–96) restricted all Western sea trade to one port, Canton (Guangzhou). The Qing further restricted Western trade by keeping Western traders outside the city walls. D-Day. American soldiers fire rifles, throw grenades and wade ashore on Omaha Beach next to a German bunker during D Day landing. 1 of 5 Allied beachheads est. in Normandy, France. The Normandy Invasion of World War II launched June 6, 1944. Britannica Quiz A History of War British merchants were especially dissatisfied with their situation, as there was a great demand for Chinese tea, porcelain, and silk in Britain. The attempt to meet this demand resulted in a large trade deficit for the British, because China did not import many British goods. The difference was paid to China in large amounts of silver. To reduce the trade deficit, the British East India Company and other British merchants turned to opium. The nonmedical use of that drug had been illegal in China since the early 1700s, though this prohibition had not been successfully enforced. Over the next several decades, China repeatedly tried to ban the opium trade. In response, in the early 19th century the East India Company agreed to stop selling opium in China. In reality, however, the company aided other British merchants in smuggling opium into China, primarily from India. The trade was so profitable that not only did it eliminate the British trade deficit but vast amounts of silver now flowed out of China into British hands. The growing number of Chinese addicted to opium as well as the growing amount of silver flowing from China caused the Daoguang emperor (reigned 1820–50) and the Qing court to take action. In 1839 the court sent Lin Zexu, the special imperial commissioner, to Canton to end the smuggling of the drug into China. Lin arrested several Chinese who were involved in the smuggling. In addition, he forced Charles Elliot, the British chief superintendent of trade in China, to instruct British merchants to give up their opium inventory, which they did. More than 20,000 chests of opium—about 1,400 tons of the drug—were then destroyed. This represented a massive financial loss for the British merchants that the British government could not, and the Qing would not, make good. In July 1839 tensions between Britain and China increased when one or more British sailors killed a Chinese villager. The British government refused to turn over the accused men to the Chinese legal system, which the British considered to be barbaric. However, Elliot did pay reparations to the victim’s family, set up a court of inquiry into the incident, and eventually tried several sailors suspected of being involved but on the lesser charges of rioting and assault. His actions did not appease Lin. War breaks out First Opium War First Opium War British warships attacking a Chinese battery on the Pearl (Zhu) River during the First Opium War, 1841. The First Opium War began in late 1839 when two British warships broke the Chinese blockade of the Pearl (Zhu) River delta. They destroyed 29 Chinese vessels, setting the tone for a war dominated by the vastly superior British navy. The Chinese did have an advantage on land, but land fighting was limited. In early 1840 the British government sent a large naval fleet to China, which arrived in June. Joining that fleet later in the year was a new and advanced warship called the Nemesis. Special offer for students! Check out our special academic rate and excel this spring semester! After British negotiators’ peace proposals regarding compensation for the destroyed opium and the opening of additional trading ports were rejected by the Qing in 1841, hostilities continued. The British navy advanced up the Yangtze River (Chang Jiang), capturing forts and eventually cutting off the Grand Canal. In August 1842 the British captured the city of Nanjing (Nanking), and the Qing were forced to resume negotiations. The end of the war and the aftermath The war was ended by the Treaty of Nanjing, signed on August 29, 1842. In addition to having to pay heavy war reparations to Britain, China had to open five trading ports. One of these ports was Shanghai, which would be transformed into one of China’s major commercial entrepôts. In addition, China ceded Hong Kong to Britain, and the island would remain under British control until 1997. In 1843 the Treaty of Nanjing was supplemented by the British Supplementary Treaty of the Bogue (Humen), which gave British subjects extraterritoriality in China and gave Britain most-favoured-nation status. Soon other Western countries, such as France and the United States, forced China to give them similar privileges.

中国的金融政策

王毅四问美国 总是说一套做一套，大国信誉何在？ 一听到中国这两个字就紧张焦虑，大国的自信何在？ 只让自己保持繁荣，不允许别国正当发展，国际公理何在？ 执意垄断价值链高端，只让中国停留在低端，公平竞争何在？ 不能允许有的国家必须在餐桌上，有的国家只能在菜单里， 讲到我们台湾问题 不允许台湾从祖国分裂出去是底线，纵容支持台独必引火烧身，其实这是大陆的一贯主轴，谁想搞台独必将遭到历史的清算，我相信大家迟早会看到一张国际社会遵守一中原则的全家福照片，只是时间问题而已，这是王毅展现了大国的自信 中国的金融政策不能因咽废食，希腊做假账可以防范，用条约制止，或其他方法的设置，中国的金融政策一定不能问道於华尔街或FED，俄罗斯因为问道于华尔街，国家马上崩，日本崩，今天中国的问题，恒大以及房地产的问题，一方面是中国的内政，因为中国金融对银行界的监管不力，一个国家的成长一方面要学习一方面要出血，这是不可避免的，西方国家的经济也是花了三百年而成就今天的经验，要成功， 就得对着干，要学习别人的好处，学习别人的经验，创造自己的经济政策，创造自己的金融未来，要超越别人的短处，学习别人的长处，比方说银行界不能越界到产业界。今后世界金融的政策以及美国的法律等等不能不知道，应该设置一个机构能够由各界知识分子联合参谋。另外一方面要去美元化， 去美国化，不能与美国挂钩，不能与美国金融界挂钩，应该与黄金挂钩，有美国的市场，没有美国的市场，有欧洲的市场，没有欧洲的市场，还有中东的市场，还有非洲的市场等等，要如何自由的运作，就是要发挥自自己的能力， 应该我做我的你做你的。

Diiptimanananda

3/20/2024 They are talking about the silence retreat day, where they sit for 9 hours a day. I remembered the day with DaDa I.K. I always sat in Lotus position for over 9 hours a day. Sometimes I sat in the park, starting in the early morning, still in the dark. It was from two and a half hours to three hours each time, three times a day. On fasting days, I would find a temple and sit there the whole day. The good thing was nine hours in Lotus position. This kind of training, training myself always and disciplining myself when I was young, was quite an experience. We wasted a lot of money on road repairs. I don't see any good, worthy results from the completed work. I hope the person in charge did not squander our money." Dada Diiptimanananda is here; you can ask him. Years ago, we had a retreat here. The retreat ends on Monday, and this was Sunday. We were in the cafeteria, where many Philippine margii from New York were present. Dada Diiptimanananda was with us. Dada saw me and sent me a message: What in his mind was "He didn't like to do kirtan with me." So, he decided to leave with the Philippine margii on Sunday, choosing not to stay here until the end of the retreat. I believed Dada didn't know that I could read people's minds. 大国有大国的风度, 大国人民有大国人民的风度. 我不是美国人, 也不是印度人, 但是, 我是一个大国的国民. Great nations have their own demeanor, and the people of great nations have their own demeanor. I am not American, nor am I Indian, but I am a citizen of a great nation." I want to tell you why BaBa didn't want to come to America. Yanglo saxon wanted Black i drove down on downtown 7th streedt in Los Angeles. i saw a guy standing by the wall of a police station. He shows me a smoking jesture means "do you want to buy cokcane?" i wandered why this guy dare to sell crocane just right under the police territory? Later, i read newspaper, they said White are afraid black people become too many, more than white. There are a lot of cokcane confiscated. Police are using those crocane to feed black people so people can addict to it they will not come up strongly. They will lose everything, their pride, their house, their job, etc. In order control black people population, white build many abortion clinic around black school, or closer to black school. then, propaganda to abortion. They encourge black students if they get preganant, they can go to get abortion. They make abortion so easy. i have wisdom of God, i can see what's going on in America. Right now, white want to build fence in order not to let latin American come to United States. Last election, too many Latin American elected Biden to be the president. It showed numbers and overwhilemed Latin American is going to have more numbers than white. This is need a stop there. Even they don't want to have Latin American come to work those jobs which American white don't want to work. Even so, they are alert. They don't want them to come. They had a black president once. They don't want to have a second mistake. Too see an latin American become a president in the United States. See This Rubi is coming out. Yanglo Saxon wanted Black go down. Back to 1990, one day I drove down on downtown 7th Street in Los Angeles. I saw a guy standing by the wall of a police station. He showed me a smoking gesture, meaning 'Do you want to buy cocaine?' I wondered why this guy dared to sell cocaine right under the police territory. Later, I read in the newspaper that White people were afraid of Black people becoming too numerous, outnumbering Whites. There had been a lot of cocaine confiscated in the police station. Police were using this cocaine to feed Black people so they could get addicted, and they will not rise up strongly. They would lose everything: their pride, their house, their job, etc. In order to control the Black population, Whites built many abortion clinics around Black schools or closer to Black schools. Then, they propagated abortion. They encouraged Black students that if they get pregnant, they can go to get an abortion. They made abortion so easy. I have the wisdom of God, and I can see what's going on in America. Right now, Whites want to build a fence to prevent Latin Americans from coming to the United States. In the last election, too many Latin Americans elected Biden as the president. It showed that in numbers, overwhelmed Latin Americans are going to have more numbers than Whites. This needs to stop. Even if they don't want Latin Americans to work those jobs that White Americans don't want to do, they are alert. They don't want them to come. They had a Black president once; they don't want to make a second mistake. They don't want to see another Latin American president appeared in the United States. Seeing Florida coming out a guy named Ruby Only white can enjoy democracy. Yes, Amerrica is a democracy coounttry.. but,, not black, not colors.. white can talk aboout genecite Indiians. but wee can not,, when you talk on this kind of topic,, someonee out theree will stop you.. Wwhite can talk this kind of talk is needed, to show howw amerricann are so noble,, so generrous,, soo kind,, to otherr races.. Tthis high tallk is needed just to show only.. they know they are not seriiouuss. the problem when we see it,,this kind of tallk,, oh!1 theyy aree serriouss.. May be once in a thousand years.. it is a show only

中东战争

3/6/2024 American government using foolish people policy, same as Taiwanese government. Jewish is making samskara to genecise Palastinian Today, will be geneccise themselves in the future. Part of the American are the supporter. They will be reborn into the same race as Jewish people today. 今天乌克兰的政客, 把这个富二代的乌克兰掏空,以致于到了今天的田地, 他们刚从苏俄解体出来的时候, 什么都有, 他们能够造军舰, 航空母舰, 飞机和火炮, 世界最大粮仓, 今天苏俄不能造舰, 得给向中国买,因为苏俄的舰艇都是在乌建造的,以前有核弹,也给西方用钱的诱惑跟政客交换, 自己自宫了, 没了; 对日抗战时, 他说如果我们的人都投降了, 那么我们还能剩下什么呢? Today, Ukrainian politicians have emptied the pockets of this wealthy second generation Ukrainian to the point that, at present, they have come to this situation. When they first emerged from the dissolution of the Soviet Union, they had everything—they could build warships, aircraft carriers, airplanes, and artillery. They were the world's largest granary. Nowadays, Russia cannot build ships; they have to buy them from China because the Soviet Union's naval vessels were all built in Ukraine. They used to have nuclear weapons, but they succumbed to the temptation of money from the West and exchanged them with politicians. Now, they have nothing left. During the resistance against Japan, A Chinese solider said, "If all our people surrender, then what will be left for us?" 自公元前12世纪犹太人的祖先希伯来人来到巴勒斯坦建立希伯来王国时期, 巴勒斯坦一直处在周围大国的侵占与争夺之中他先后被波斯希腊罗马和土耳其等外族占领, 在此期间绝大部分犹太人被驱逐出巴勒斯坦, 因此犹太人流散到世界各地,1917年英国占领了巴勒斯坦当时啊犹太资产阶级鼓吹的犹太复国主义已经兴起他们谋求在巴勒斯坦建立犹太民族的国家欧洲各地犹太人啊也在巴勒斯坦移民制裁巴勒斯坦的犹太人, 从1880年的不足两万人增加了1917年的5.6万人, 英国为了便于统治采取了分而治之的政策1917年11月英国外交大臣贝尔福发表宣言,赞成巴勒斯坦建立一个犹太人之家, 1920年巴勒斯坦正式变成英国的委任统治地在英国的统治期间啊巴勒斯坦的犹太移民急剧增加啊第二次世界大战后美国取代了英国在中东的地位, 犹太复国主义得到了美国的支持1947年11月联合国通过巴勒斯坦编制建立一个犹太国和一个阿拉伯国的决议, 根据决议占人口总数2/3的巴勒斯坦人只占面积不到43%的丘陵和贫瘠地区而占人口总数不到1/3的犹太人却在面积57%的肥沃土地对此阿拉伯人表示强烈反对1948年5月14日犹太人单方面宣布成立以色列国, 以色列建国的第二天埃及约旦伊拉克叙利亚和黎巴嫩五分东北南三路攻入巴勒斯坦； 第一次中东战争爆发， 刚刚建国的以色列， 伤亡惨重， 但经美苏英等国的活动下，双方同意停火四周，这给了以色列喘息之机，以趁机迅速扩充军队， 从法英捷等国购进大批武器装备， 迅速组建了陆海空三军， 调整作战部署，经过充分准备， 以军於7月9日向阿军队发起十天进攻，阿军虽然局部击退以军进攻，但以色列夺取了阿拉伯大约一千平方千米的土地， 这是阿拉伯内部矛盾，进一步激化，10月15日以色列趁势将加利利地区和内格夫发起攻击，进展顺利，1949年1月7日双方停战，参战国签订停战协议，战争激化了参战国之间的矛盾,中东局势混乱不堪；1956年7月26日埃及宣布将苏伊士运河总公司收归国，10月29日深夜，以色列十万大军突然侵入埃及西奈半岛， 第二次中东战争爆发，为配合以军的进攻，英法两国出动飞机轰炸埃及军事基地，吸引埃军主力， 接着以色列军队大举进攻，英法军队也从塞得港登陆，向运河区进攻，切断埃军退路，围歼埃军，埃及总统纳赛尔识破英法企图，命东部军区切断以军空降兵退路，利用地形优势，将以军围困于米特拉山口，为实现中间突破以军迂回攻击埃军防守薄弱的打卡山口，威胁西奈北部埃及主立，10月31日以军攻占阿博尔格拉，11月6日英法炮轰塞得港，企图利用陆战队一举占领运河区，但是遭到埃及居民的奋勇反击，英法以的武装入侵，激起了全世界人民的愤怒，英法军队被迫撤出埃及，以色列军队撤出西奈，第二次中东战争以侵略者失败而宣告结束；1967年6月5日以色列再次向埃及叙利亚和约旦发动进攻挑起第三次中东战争，在美国的支持下以色列的六天内，侵占了约旦河西岸，加沙地带西奈半岛，格兰高地，共6.5万平方千米；1973年10月6日埃及叙利亚军队和巴勒斯坦游击队发动第四次中东战争，这战争进行了18天，双方出动军队达到了110万人， 战争发生之后，埃及军队越过苏伊士运河，摧毁以色列的“巴列夫防线“夺回西奈半岛，八千平方千米的地带，叙利亚军队一度攻占了戈兰高地的一些距点，但是10月15日, 以色列军队出动运诃成功，战争的形势发生逆转，以军取得了战争的主动权， 渡过运河，在东岸作战的埃及的第三军，有被包围歼灭的危险，面对这种形势联合国安理会通过了“338号决议”, 要求立即停止战斗，在联合国的干预下，以色列被迫同意停火， 1978年9月在美国倡议下，美埃以三国举行关于中东问题最高会议，签署关于实现中东和平的纲要， 1979年3月签订埃以和平条约，从而结束了两国间历时三十年之久的战争状态。

Anisha is sick

You know Kamsa? Anisha just like Kamsa. Didi said she is spreading poison everywhere. i think she is sick. so i treat her as a sick person. She need a doctor. She likes gosiip about me. spending two hours just telling margii around just to tell them how bad i am. so here, i want to use this platform for her to tell me what's wrong with me. i didn't know her. We exchanged a few times of conversation before. i believe she doesn't know me at all. But how can she create so much words about me lasted for two hours. Since i want to save her time, so why not just tell me what you fell about me here. Tell everyone i'm such a bad person. this and that. Many margii likes gosiip too. i also like to learn what she is saying about me. i can correct my self if i'm really wrong. When i mentioned our mail box problem, Hinamaya wanted to install a surveoy, Anisha and Ramesha objected it. When they have problem, they agree to install a surveyor. Is it funny? My problem is individual problem, should not take it out here, your problem is really a problem, we all need to discuss it.

坏人

胡荣财家搞乩童,以为可以赚大钱, 到我, 我也不知自己是神人, 当然搅了他们的生意, 林锦发就是个彻头彻尾的大坏蛋, 这种人者么活在世 compare Hong Kong and Taiwan, i visited Hong Kong at 10 years old. i have many relatives in Hong Kong. My two grand mom, many counsins and newphews. Uncle 7 and 8 they are communists. Hong Kong people are richer than Taiwanese. But, we can pirated books and records etc. According to my ability, i can buy many books, many records. i studied all of them which i'm interested and curious. i started to learn Western music, like Bathovon, Barha, Mozart, etc. i bought them package by package. i listed and played them One by one, until i'm familiar to them. i found out not my relatives in Hong Kong. They have no money to buy them, those are patented rights. very expensive. how much? i found out the hotel room need 100 a night. and my salary is NT 2500 it's about less than us$100 a month. Compared to margii Today in America. Many poor family they can not afford to pay to the fifth street in Manhattan. Broadway and Kenneydy Hall in D.C. i'm PLining to teach i-ching. On a phisicail level and psychic level, it tell you everything in the world you want to know and predict the future you want to know. Like you go to a place, like such kapalica meditation, where to go you can get the most benifit from your meditation. it's good to get or it is good to discard.