打仗

全軍精力向打仗聚焦 how do you reconcile the fact that to make it work for China? It seems to be based on a high level of depression, environmental destruction, censorship, a certain ideological stubbornness. we've spoken about Hong Kong, the Uigers. how do you reconcile , and why do you think that i mean do you think that horrible? i'm glad you ask that question because your question captured very well. The Anglo Saxon media's perception of China, i would suggest you very bluntly. There is a distorted perspective of reality. Let's take the first word, you use repression. If the communist party of China only relied on repression to stay in power, it would not create the most dynamic economy in the world. It is by far the most dynamic economy in the world. It has delivered the fastest growing economy for 30 years. And it has done this by educating the Chinese people to a level and extent that the Chinese people have never been educated ever before, you say is repression? it is obviously you are taking the old cold war mindset. i was in Moscow in 1976, and i saw repression in Moscow. And when i was in Moscow, the Soviet citizens were not allowed to travel outside the Soviet Union. That's a repression, In the year twenty nineteen hundred and thirty nine. One hundred and twenty nine million Chinese left China freely. Guess what? Zero defectors! Hundred and thirty nine million Chinese. That's twice of population of the UK went back to China. So all your description, when you say environmental degradation, the China's climate change policies are far more respondible than those of the United States which is not once but twice withdrawn from global environmental protocols. Kyoto protocol. The Bush administration left 8 years, Paris accords, Trump administration left 4 years, What the reason why we having climate change today is not because of new flows of greenhouse gas emissions from China and India. It's because of what the western countries have put in the atmosphere since the western industrial revolution get the data, the single largest contributor cumulatively. It's number one United States, number two, Europe, number three, China. And the west wants China to pay an economic price for the current flows, For the west doesn't want to pay an economic price for what input in the atmosphere. You want to deprive the Indians of eletricity When the United, just by the way, if the United States could impose a dollar a gallon tax that would save the world, cut down gasoline consumption, raise money for investment, in green technology, simple solutions. And by contrast, the largest reforestation program in the world is carried out by China. It has already reinforced it in that area. in the size of Belgium or bigger. So all your descriptions capture the natural distortions of China that you get in the Anglo Saxon media, which violate the rules of the enlightenment which say that you must be a rational, calm, and objective, especially in understanding your adversary. If the Chinese were as stupid and as incompetent, as you describe them to be don't worry about them. But i can assure you you are now dealing with a far more intelligent and rational actor that doesn't fit any of the Anglo Saxton categories that you applied to them, Forgive my bloodless, Now you're putting words into my mouth. China is not a oppressive system. You have no formal censorship in western societies, You have informal censorship, it goes down to political correctness, and even in the greatest universities, the political culture is pushing towards political correctness, and there's no formal censorship, there's so many things, you just cannot say anymore. if you want an example of this, read the Financial Times this weekend, lunch with ft is with a Chau yale professor Amy Chau. She spoke freely see what happened to her! That's also censorship.