America and China

The United States sees China as a threat not because of anything that China does or is, other than being big and successful and therefore China's only offense the American dominance. China has a very good political structure to make their people happy. That structure is "PROUT". China take care of poor people, America doesn't. Many workers thought they can use me to work for them. They are right and also wrong. Sees Him always. You don't know what He wants then find it out first.

Retum Cancer

in JUly 2024, i had gone through brain operation. through mri and ct, one day they called me and told i had cancer. then, Dr Bearsley said i had to take radiation from Dr Mackala, in order to avoid the cancer may come back to the old place or other place. Radiation targeted to where the mass was located. and i need to take chemo pill. everyday 3 pills in the morning and 2 in the everning for 28 days. On simulation, i felt my palm felt numb. after 8 days, it's became havier. ends on August 22, 2025.

To build a big dam

Friends, China has officially started construction on the 1.2 trillion yuan hydropower project on the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo River. This major move not only completely reshapes China’s hydropower development layout, but also ushers the contest over water resources in South Asia into a brand-new stage. When the news spread from Beijing to India’s capital, New Delhi, it instantly blew up on social media. On Twitter, the dam in Tibet became a hot topic, and many Indian television stations repeatedly broadcast aerial footage of the Yarlung Tsangpo River. The anchors reported with such urgency that it sounded like a strong wind was blowing. So, just how impressive is this super project? It plans to build five hydropower stations continuously along a 500-kilometer stretch of the river, with a combined power generation capacity of 60 million kilowatts, producing about 300 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity per year—roughly equivalent to 1.5 times the output of the Three Gorges Dam. The plan is to complete the main construction in 12 years, and have all the generators fully operational within 15 years. How will the 1.2 trillion yuan investment be spent? About 40% goes into building dams and digging tunnels—these civil engineering works. Another 20% will be spent on purchasing generators, transformers, and other electromechanical equipment. Around 15% is allocated to building transmission lines to deliver the power. Another 10% is specifically reserved for ecological protection. The remaining 15% will be used to relocate and resettle residents. The environmental impact assessment report alone is 2,000 pages long. It not only aims to preserve the river’s natural form, but also to restore alpine meadows. In the future, the relocated locals will live in newly planned tourist towns. In fact, as early as 1919, Sun Yat-sen already proposed developing the Yarlung Tsangpo’s water resources in his National Development Plan. From then until the official groundbreaking on July 20, 2025, this “heavenly river” has waited 106 years. For over a century, the Chinese people have longed to tap into the Yarlung Tsangpo’s hydropower potential. Now, this dream has finally come true. This grand project is not just a pile of numbers, but a true technological upgrade. For the first time, China’s self-developed 800-megawatt hydro turbine units are being deployed at scale. The Beidou satellite navigation system works in tandem with hard-rock tunneling machines, and digital blasting technology enables millisecond-level precision monitoring during construction. All of these allow the project’s pace to far surpass that of the Three Gorges or Baihetan hydropower stations. China’s hydropower technology has risen from mediocrity to the world’s best—moving from following others’ standards to setting our own. And while building, we have not forgotten ecological protection. We deliberately left 33 kilometers of natural river channel as a sanctuary for fish, and restored 1,200 hectares of alpine tundra above the tunnels. This shows that our understanding of hydropower has become much more comprehensive: It’s not just about generating electricity, but about integrating energy supply, economic development, ecological protection, and people’s livelihoods—forming the backbone of green development. The Yarlung Tsangpo hydropower project carries enormous national significance. It secures energy safety and strengthens geopolitical security. It is also a crucial piece of the puzzle in the “West-to-East Power Transmission” and “carbon neutrality” strategies. When completed, it will generate 300 billion kilowatt-hours of clean electricity annually, equivalent to saving about 90 million tons of standard coal and reducing 240 million tons of CO₂ emissions. It will also provide green power for AI and new energy vehicle industries. Controlling the upper Yarlung Tsangpo means holding the initiative. After it flows out of China, the river becomes the Brahmaputra, supporting millions in India and Bangladesh. With cascade dams, China can store tens of billions of cubic meters of water, releasing it during drought and holding it during floods—optimizing water allocation. Every drop of water released can send an important signal. Thus, the project is not just a power plant but also a vital strategic water resource, giving China more say in South Asian affairs. The Yarlung Tsangpo project is truly extraordinary—it is rewriting the rules of international river development. It proposes a new approach of full-basin cooperation. At first, Bangladesh worried the river flow would change, but what they really care about is whether water supply can remain stable during dry seasons, because the Brahmaputra’s low flows in dry seasons cause over $1.2 billion in annual agricultural losses in Bangladesh. China’s cascade dams, on the other hand, can regulate flow and help reduce those losses. Nepal and even Bhutan see this as a great opportunity for cooperation; Bhutan has already approached China about jointly developing cross-border water resources and learning China’s advanced hydropower technology. China’s technical strength in managing international rivers is pushing people to rethink traditional water rights theories. Of course, there are also plenty of troublemakers. The U.S. jumped in, claiming to worry about downstream countries’ water security—but anyone can see it’s just trying to use this to rally South Asian countries to contain China. The EU isn’t much better, supporting environmental NGOs to accuse the project of harming glaciers—while ignoring the countless dams they themselves have built on the Rhine and Danube. This double standard only proves that the Yarlung Tsangpo project is no ordinary infrastructure—it breaks the rules set by the West and marks a milestone for China taking charge of its own water resource development. For India, the impact of this project directly affects the China–India border situation. After the 2020 Galwan Valley clash, India deployed 120,000 troops on the eastern border, trying to compensate for geographic disadvantage with manpower. But once this project is operational, the situation changes. China won’t even need to move a single soldier—just adjusting river flow could put pressure on India. For example, if during the dry season we reduce the water flowing into India by 10%, Assam’s tea plantations could suffer due to lack of irrigation. And if we release water early before the monsoon, India’s border roads could be paralyzed by flooding for a month. This kind of non-military deterrence is more effective than simply sending more troops and could strategically shift the border dynamics. Naturally, India won’t just sit idly by. So they’ve started building over 70 small hydropower stations in China’s southern Tibet in an attempt to weaken China’s control over the river by scattering development. But the combined capacity of those stations is only 3 million kilowatts, with outdated technology and serious ecological damage—clearly no match. On top of that, India’s intelligence agencies keep infiltrating Tibet and paying locals to stage so-called environmental protests. But China’s grassroots management in Tibet is strong, and none of these sabotage attempts have succeeded. Meanwhile, India’s own Tehri Dam on the upper Ganges has diverted so much water that Bangladesh suffers huge irrigation shortages every year—yet India still has the audacity to criticize China’s project. That’s India’s double standard. On the other hand, Tibet’s own development path is also changing thanks to this project. Previously, Tibet relied on state subsidies and tourism to get by. Now, with the hydropower, energy, and ecological industries booming, other industries are upgrading too, creating new ways to earn. Construction has driven cement demand in Tibet up several times over. Sichuan’s heavy equipment factories are overwhelmed with orders. Even before the Chongqing–Nyingchi railway is fully completed, its freight capacity is already near full. For the 18,000 relocated residents, it’s not just about moving—they’re being settled into planned tourist towns, made shareholders, and even given stakes in homestay businesses. According to the plan, by 2035, their incomes are expected to multiply several times over. Tibet will no longer depend on handouts but earn from its own resources. This hydropower project is like a bond, tightly linking Tibet with the nation’s energy supply, economic development, and progress. It’s not just about immediate results, but about China’s steady determination to grow stronger step by step. The great river roars, and the rules are rewritten. On the roof of the world, China is building not just dams, but also a steel backbone of national will. As for India—if it remains stubborn, this river will teach it who truly is the master of Asia’s water tower.

可恶的EX

你到大英博物馆就知道小偷是谁，他们在中国， 打，砸，烧，抢，无恶不作。更嚣张的是偷了人家的东西。还当作献宝现出来， 给世界观看。 最可恶的就是那些EX。怪不得Ranqi，他们是不让Ex再回到组织里面来。因为他们知道是与非。他们就利用巴巴的教导来欺负人。而且利用巴巴的教导，拿巴巴的教导。不去做好事， 反而去做坏事，帮助他们去做坏事，让他们变得更坏。所以Ranqi不让ex再回到组织里面来，他们可以回来，但是只能参加DC。不能做任何组织里面的工作，不能参加组织里面的活动。 When my Kundalini rose, I could feel I wasn’t human — I felt superhuman. Yes, when I practiced the second lesson, I immediately felt like a god. Each time my Kundalini hum rose to my throat, I knew there was some kind of superpower within me, or some kind of revelation coming. Those who haven’t reached this level of Kundalini will never understand this kind of feeling, this kind of power in the body, this kind of force that overwhelms you. Please, don’t think your meditation is the same as mine — it’s not. This power of concentration is beyond anything your mind can imagine. My meditation is far, far beyond your imagination if you are not at this level. So please, don’t say “my Kundalini is like this or that,” because you don’t know. Don’t say “this Shiva Tantra is like this or that,” because you haven’t even felt a drop of it. People born on islands tend to have narrow minds, such as the Japanese, Taiwanese, Hongkongers, and people from the Nordic countries. To change this kind of personality is difficult, difficult, difficult — the only way is to practice the Sixth Lesson more.

NO ONE KNOWS

按照我现在的标准, 这小区美国margii没有一个人懂得Ba’Ba’的教导， 密宗的历史由来出处，还有PROUT. 这个小区的美国白人， 那一个不是种族主义者， 那种种族主义已入到了他们的无意识的深度，不相信？ 我若说错了， 我下地狱， 我对，那你就下地狱。 According to my many years of experience in understanding people, those born on islands tend to have narrow minds — for example, people from Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, the Nordic countries, and so on. To change this kind of personality is very, very, very difficult; the only way is to practice Lesson Six more.

In Sanskrit grammar, the plural of sūtra (सूत्र)

In all vertions of Ananda Sutra, 1-21 written in: Bhumavyapte mahatiaham cittayorpranashe sagunasthitih savikapalsamadhih va. i think should be written in " Bhumavyaptemahat Ahamcittayorpranashe sagunasthitih savikalpa samadhih va. Because "sutra" is neuter. So the singular term for "sutra" is "sutram" also as a object. dual type is "sutre", and plural type is "sutrani"; so "Ananda Sutra" should be in "Ananda Sutram" and also as object. In Sanskrit grammar, the plural of sūtra (सूत्र) is: ➡️ sūtrāṇi (सूत्राणि) — in the nominative plural neuter. Explanation: sūtra is a neuter noun (it literally means “thread” or “aphoristic rule”). Neuter nouns in -a in Sanskrit (like deva → devāḥ for masculine, but sūtra is neuter) have: singular: sūtram dual: sūtre plural: sūtrāṇi So for example: ekam sūtram — one sūtra dve sūtre — two sūtras bahūni sūtrāṇi — many sūtras What's the difference between dual and plural? Good question — and it’s an important distinction in Sanskrit grammar! In Sanskrit, nouns, pronouns, adjectives, and verbs inflect not just for singular and plural (as in English), but also for dual. Here’s the difference: Number Meaning Example Singular (ekavacana) Refers to one item «devaḥ» — one god Dual (dvivacana) Refers to exactly two items «devau» — two gods Plural (bahuvacana) Refers to more than two items (three or more) «devāḥ» — gods (three or more) Why does Sanskrit have a dual? Sanskrit (like ancient Greek and a few other Indo-European languages) preserved the ancient dual number, which specifically marks two things. For example: mātā-pitarau — “the two parents” (mother & father) nayanē — “the two eyes” In English, we just say “parents” or “eyes” regardless of whether we’re thinking of two or more, but Sanskrit distinguishes. On verbs: The verb endings also reflect this number: singular: गच्छति (gacchati) — he/she/it goes dual: गच्छतः (gacchataḥ) — the two go plural: गच्छन्ति (gacchanti) — they (3+) go So the dual is used only when the subject (or object) is exactly two. The plural is used when the subject (or object) is more than two.

Jeffery Slachs says 07-08-2025

Chna is no threat. The risk is from inside. Stop playing with Taiwan the way you're doing. Sorry, it's stupid. Stop provoking things. Anyway, so China's not gonna turn the US into a dictatorship. Maybe the US will turn into a dictatorship. Maybe it will just turn into a plain old plutocracy. Maybe it will turn into a military industrial state as the complete dominance. I don't know. But it's not going to come from China. It's going to come from Inside that's where our risk is ……………. China's not able to defeat us. The only risk we face from China, the only risk we face from China's nuclear war. So stay away from nuclear war. Stop playing with Taiwan the way you're doing. Sorry, it's stupid. Stop provoking things and footnote we provoke the war in Ukraine. I could go on for about 8 hours on that, and maybe it's worth 5 minutes. But we provoked the war in Ukraine absolutely surely, and we'll do the same with Taiwan and we'll lose any wars that happens, but maybe the world will end also over this stupidity and the people in Washington are stupid. I'm telling you. I know them. This is not my surmise. And I just read an unbelievably stupid article in an unbelievably awful journal called Foreign Affairs. What's her name? First name? I don't remember. Carlin is her second name. Oh my God. It's about how we have to prepare for the next war, not I don't think the word diplomacy is mentioned one time. So the first thing is Johnson, Professor Mearsheimer says yeah. China can't defeat us. We can't defeat China. But China could annoy us, and it will annoy us more if China's the hegemon of East Asia. So we have to prevent China from being the hegemon of East Asia so that the United States is the only hegemon in the world, the only regional hegemon. What a thing to do. That could provoke nuclear war. And I said, but, John, that could lead to war between the US and China. Yeah, yeah, it's actually likely. Very possible. He says maybe we could avoid it, but it's quite possible. I said, no, you take the expected value of total annihilation. It's got a big negative sign. It's minus infinity as far as I'm concerned. And so you don't do that. You don't put any positive probability on something like that. So this is the first point of disagreement. The second point of disagreement is essentially about game theory. Everyone here knows the prisoner's dilemma. The prisoner’s dilemma is a situation where it pays to cooperate, but the dominant strategy for each player is to not cooperate because if the other side cooperates, you cheat and you win, and if the other side doesn't cooperate, you certainly don't play the soccer and so you end up non cooperative, non cooperative and you're off to the races in war. And that's game theory. and that's what's taught at Rand and that's what these people in Washington think and that's how they play and that's how they talk. And the fact is though, you put real people and I mean non economic students. Real people into an experimental game and they cooperate half the time, 3/4 of the time, and then wonder of wonders, you let the two people talk beforehand. Not to make a binding agreement, just to chat. Hey, why don't we both cooperate? For example, no signed contract in game theory. That's called cheap talk. It should have no effect on the equilibrium. But in real human practice. If you put two normal people in the prisoners dilemma game, they cooperate half the time. If you let them have pre play communication they cooperate more than 90% of the time. Human beings. So my advice is, hey, why doesn't President Biden or somebody that actually can function as a president in the future? I actually talked to President Putin. You know, actually understand President Putin's point of view. Why is this war going on? Discuss it. You know, cooperation could rise enormously. There's a second point of game theory which is very important, called the folk theorem. Which is that if you were in a repeated play of the Prisoner's dilemma and there's no set terminal date. Then you should cooperate so you don't mess up trust of the two sides, because you're playing also against future actions and you wanna show I'm trustworthy, you're trustworthy. We can gain from cooperation period after period. And that's another way to sustain the good outcome in a prisoner’s dilemma. So I view international relations theory, realist theory as essentially being the prisoner’s dilemma or the Hobbesian dilemma of nation states in an anarchic environment. And my argument is, it’s not so anarchic. It’s not so threatening, the only real threat is nuclear war.So stay away from that. That’s the bright red line for all of us. And cooperation is just not so hard. And I look to many examples history where cooperation worked. And I wrote a book in 2013 about one such episode because I found it completely amazing when I learned about it, and that was the aftermath of the Cuban Missile crisis, when first of all, Kennedy rejected the advice of all his advisors except one because they all said go bomb these sites in Cuba. And now in retrospect we almost surely would not be here talking today, had we gone on to do that. But Kennedy was very much more cautious, and he spent all the days of the crisis asking, what's going through Khrushchev's mind? He's a human being. What's he doing? And he finally came to the realization, you know, this is not meant by Krushchev to be the end of the world. This is not meant. This is . We can both pull back. And that's what they ended up doing. And then that was October 1962. And in 1963, Kennedy made a campaign for peace that culminated that led to the Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, which was signed with the Soviet Union in July 1963. And it culminated, I think, in Kennedys assassination because there were enough people in the US government that didn't like his peace initiatives. And so I think it was an inside job. And I think the evidence grows all the time that it was on. But in any event, Kennedy's idea was the two sides can make peace. And when he said that, and he said it in the most beautiful terms, and his speechwriter was a gifted, gifted person named Theodore Sorenson that I got to know luckily because he lived in our neighborhood. When I came to Columbia University and I got to know him, he said in the most eloquent and beautiful words imaginable. We can make peace even with the Soviet Union, even at the height of the cold war. And he said it so beautifully that when Khrushchev heard the speech, he immediately called the American envoy, Averell Harriman, and said, I want to make peace with your president because he was inspired by the words actually, and they made peace and that treaty lasted, and it led to the Nuclear nonproliferation treaty. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is an international treaty aimed at preventing the spread of nuclear wapoons and promoting cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. It also seeks to further the goal of achieving nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament. The NPT was opened for signature on July 1, 1968. And entered into force on March 5, 1970. Five years later it changed the world. And so that's the optimistic side. Go for peace instead. There's an awful president of ours when he could function still, he was terrible Biden, all he could do was insult Putin every moment. How you gonna make peace, all you do is throw insults at the one who had a country with 6000 nuclear warheads. This is crazy. It's reckless. And the whole place in Washington is filled with people who are playing game theory, who know just what Putin's going to do. You know, we have no alternative but to increase our military. This woman, Carlin, who was a senior official under Biden in the Defense Department that wrote this article says we have no choice but to deter through building our military. She doesn't even mention the idea that there could be diplomacy with China. This woman's an ignoramus. I'm sorry. I've been to China 100 times at least. There's no intrinsic battle with China. None whatsoever. China's not out to defeat the US and couldn't do so in a million years anyway. We'd all perish. I'm trying to never. China's never, by the way, even once invaded a country overseas in its whole history of 2245 years since 221 BC, when the Qin Empire unified China. Did they ever invade Japan? Not once did they ever invade Korea. Not once did they ever invade Vietnam? Yes, 17 years. In that 2000 years, 4 actually 17 years and one month. 1420 to 1436 and then one month in 1979. And the United States, we've never been at peace. All we do is war. And you know what the truth is? We learned it from here. Because the British Empire was the most militarized society imaginable. And unfortunately the leaders of this country, and it turns out not to matter which party, because Star Wars is as bad as Boris Johnson. All they know is the military. It's unbelievable. What's the first thing that Starmer does when he becomes Prime Minister? He goes to Kiev to pledge the endless support of the US, by the way, because Britain doesn't do anything. The endless support of the United States to the defeat of Russia, and then he flies across the Atlantic to try to convince Biden to authorize what authorized means is for the US military to enable deep strikes inside Russia. That's really a clever thing to do, especially. Because Putin said, well, then we'd be at war with each other and we'd be forced to reconsider our nuclear strategy. And then we have our CIA director in this. This would be great for the West End theater, by the way, because it's a kind of parody. The CIA director meets with the MI 6 director on stage recently here and says, oh, don't worry about Putin's bluff. Well, my advice is if you're gonna say that, say that before we're all annihilated, because no one's gonna hear you after we're all annihilated. How do we know he's bluffing? He's not bluffing if this if Russia is fundamentally threatened. So that's, I don't remember what you asked me, but that's my answer. I thank you very much. That was quite remarkable. It definitely isn't sort of the mainstream opinion, I guess. So you talked about how there isn't this kind of struggle with China and how the United States, the US empire doesn't need to position itself as kind of the leader. But there is kind of a struggle between, if not between US and China, between democracy and dictatorship in sort of various countries, various economies, various circles. And the United States is at the forefront of that, at least in economic terms. And of course, with dictatorships now becoming a lot more sustainable, you know, they're not kind of obsessed with this self subsistence. They're all trading with each other. Is there any way in which there is still a fight on our hands when it comes to politics? 好听到这儿暂停一下。这位观众提问非常典型，他完全套用了西方主流媒体的叙事框架，他问题的核心就是民主国家是不是应该对抗那些独裁国家？也想之际，美国作为民主灯塔，是不是要站出来主持正义？这其实是一种被洗脑后的提问方式他根本没有想过这套民主对独裁的叙事本身是不是一个骗局 Well, I'd love for the United States to be a functioning democracy and to be a good example for other countries. I don't believe the US has any right or any ability to put in place a democracy in any other country. Nor do I believe, by the way, that the American democracy functions as a real democracy anymore. On the life and death issues, nobody has asked the American people anything about all these wars for decades. And by the way, I can tell you. And I'm telling you authoritatively and truly, they lie about everything about these wars. And so that's not that's not democracy either. Everything is phony, everything is narrative. And so on the war and peace issues, the public has no say at all. If you were to ask the American people now and in fact Gallup does it do you support Biden's foreign policy? I think the support is you can look it up 25 to 35% perhaps. I don't even think it reaches 35%, whereas the Democracy in this, it's a game. This is the deep state and they have their wars and every war has been phony , some wars, the American people are basically never told about, for example, the war in Syria, and you may actually hear from grown up reporters. Who are lying through their teeth or ignorant beyond imagining that Ohh, the war in Syria. Yes, Russia intervened in Syria. Well, do you know that the that Obama tasks the CIA to overthrow the Syrian government starting four years before Russia intervened? What kind of nonsense is that? And how many times did the New York Times report on Operation Timber Sycamore, which was the presidential order to the CIA to overthrow Bashar al-Assad? Three times in 10 years. This is not democracy. This is a game, and it's a game of narrative. Why did the US invade Iraq in 2003? Well, first of all, it was completely phony pretenses. It wasn't. Ohh, we were so wrong. They didn't have weapons of mass destruction. They actually did focus groups in the fall of 2002 to find out what would sell that war to the American people. Abram Shulsky if you want to know the name of the PR genius. They did focus groups on the war. They wanted the war all the time. They had to figure out how to sell the war to the American people, how to scare the shit out of the American people. It was a phony war. Where did that war come from? You know what, it's quite surprising that war came from Netanyahu. Actually. You know that it's weird. And the way it is, is that Netanyahu had from 1995 onward, the theory that the only way we're going to get rid of Hamas and Hezbollah is by toppling the government, supporting them. That's Iraq, Syria, and Iran, and the guys, nothing if not obsessive and where he's still trying to get us to fight Iran this day, this week. He's a deep, dark son of a bitch, sorry to tell you, because he's gotten us into endless wars and because of the power of all of this in the US politics, he's gotten his way. But that war was totally phony. So what is this democracy versus dictatorship? Come on, this is these are not even sensible terms, and even if they were sensible terms under the UN. We can have our democracy. You do what you want. It happens to be the case that China has had a centralized administrative state for 2245 years. Ever since Emperor Qin Shi Huangdi unified the Chin dynasty, there have been a few periods of. Also of a disintegration of the dynasties, but if you look through the Chin, the Han, the Tang, the Song, you know the Mining, the Ching till today, till the PRC. This is the same structure by the way,. This is an administrative state ruling over almost the same. Region, by the way for more than 2000 years, so. And by the way, it has been wondrously effective for a long time at keeping the internal peace. China's only wars were nomadic invasions from the steppes in the north. And then one crazed, well then the Mongols invading, that's part of that. And one absolutely crazed Shogun in this in the 1590s trying to take over China and he made it as far as Korea and was killed. Other than that. This has been actually exceptional statecraft until Britain had the genius idea of fighting a war to sell opium in China in 1839. One of the most noble efforts imaginable. And that's the modern era of China, so I don't buy it at all. But even if it were true, it's illegal under international law. Unwise. And you know, look at the great accomplishment for me. Oh, I don’t know how many ? hundreds of billions of dollars into Afghanistan for 20 years to get from the Taliban regime to the Taliban regime. This is American genius at democracy promotion. They don't care at all about democracy by the way. AT ALL. They topple governments they don’t like that won’t do their bidding . They topple democracies if they don’t like them. they'll topper anybody that they don't like. That's how it's worked all along. They never said, oh, we can't topple most of that in 1953. He's a democratic government. No, they toppled the democratic government in Iran and put in a police state which LED to wonderful long term relations with Iran. Because they really love the American people for that. So this is not about democracy; this is a game. And it's a terrible game and it's secret game, and it's played by the CIA, which is the most important agency in the United States. Because they have complete secrecy. Complete unaccountability. There was one review of the CIA 49 years ago. The Church Committee, and nothing since then. And as one of our directors, they're all, I was gonna say one of the worst, but they're all the same by the time they get there or by the time they leave there, because the agency takes them over. Pompeo said as he was proudly explaining The role of CIA to some Texas students a few years ago and you can find it online. He said, what do we teach at the CIA? To lie, cheat, and steal. And that's a pretty good encapsulation of the methodology. And that's a very danger world being created that way. So China's not gonna turn the US into dictatorship. Maybe US will turn into a dictatorship, maybe it will just turn into a plutocracy. Maybe it will turn into a military industrial state as the complete dominance. I don't know, but. It's not going come from China. It's going to come from inside. That’s where our risk is.

Ba'Ba' will never come to visit the United States

Ba'Ba' will never come to visit the United States I would like to say when a person's kundalinii raise up, he is not a human. He is super. He is super on everything. Do you know that? No, you don't, not until you get to that level. Most of the people, no matter, how long, how difficult,he or she practice, 40, 50, or 60 years or more, they still in the beggining level. Why? They don't know what He said. How super he is? You don't know. But here in this Katuah residential household, no one respect this kind of person. Most of them are white. They jdon't because their naive, because their arrogant, because they are hegemont. Base on this, that's why i say Ba'Ba' will never come to visit the United States.

poem

世间爹妈情最真, 泪血溶入儿女身。 殚竭心力终为子。 可怜天下父母心。

Anisha and Tusiita 的恶行恶状恶业

7/1/2025 Anisha and Tusiita didn't like Antony put his lownmower into didi's barn. Because Antony has the key to the barn. They report to didi Usa, Didi Usha gave the authority power to Anisha and Tusiita. Anisha and Tusiita changed the lock and didn't want to give the new key to Antony. this is their way to refuse Antony use the barn. 他们开始交恶， so, Antony stop working for Anisha and Tusiita. More than that, Anisha and Tusiita started to complain Antony and lie to the public. They said Antony put the lownmoder on the public property. Acutually, Anotny put the lawnmower on the school and he got permission from sister xxx on 7/1/2025. anisha and Tusiita are the sockker of the blood. They like to manuver their rights and edgemony. 5/14 Tussta said they will remove everything on the shared driveway, the shrubbs still wet, wait for it dry up. 5/13 i need to write an article "why does Anisha hate Ganesha so much? i sent $2882.00 to Narada Today. (all together), $882 via Zelle in bank of america i took out $1000 from td bank account. i setup a good irrigation system on our yard., so Agusta will do it easily. 5/12 HOA members bully a Chinese by Yaglo Saxon is so obvious. Yanglo Saxon White, Australio White, Semitism White all here tried to make a great group so they have all the power to decide any decision. Before i came down to Asheville i found out there was something happened here. i didn't know why? Once i have conflict with Anisha Ramesha and Visha Mitra said i could not go to HOA meeting. On the easement problem on our land, Ramesha said to me " it is already existed in this way, why don't you accept it." Our land originally was free of easement. Now, it became not a whole piece. All because of They knew Anisha and Tussita are not easy to talk. so they want Rudranii to yield. They don't know me at all. They thought i'm an idiot and i don't speak English. Because Anisha and Tussita help Hiranmaya and Nityanprema, it is natural Hirananyamaya favor to Anisha andnd Tussita, I told everyone here they did this for so many years. that's the main reason for them, Anisha and Tussita don't care what the rules are. They don't care. and nobody said anything. so if i didn't pay hoa fee. and what you members are going to do? sue me? They do not follow the law for five years, why i can't? i want to become a hoa preskdent, to make a regulations on punishment, it is a service. otherwise, many years people are not respect themselves never want to follow the law, either the constitution law or covenant law. 5/6 Anisha was walking her dog in the middle of the road. Unfortunately, I was driving on that road. When I made a turn, I was shocked to see someone walking in the midadle of the road. So I stopped and advised her not to walk in the middle of the road. Her response was 'funk off.' Is 'funk off' any different from 'f*** you'? What's the difference?" we have an augument. she said fuck off. i said fuck you. she is walking the dog. i am driveing on the road. she should not leave the dog walking on the road. i told her long time ago, the martha jordan road is not for walking. she never listened. and i'm driving slow as usual. she accused me driving too fast. i never driving too fast. so we started fucking each other. 5/3 someone came and said i don't want to get involved. same thing i would tell this person, i don't want to have this kind of friend, eating, drinking then you come, trouble then you don't want to get involved. In the house warming ceremony, you swear you would support this community. You forgot what you are swearing? are you in this ccommunity? ok, you don't want to get involved. and i don't want to have you in my home. 4/22/2024 We had a yoga meditation class in the library last year. Unfortunately to us, Anisha volunteered working in this library. Anisha grabed this chance to talk bad about us. She talked to our students and to the workers in the liberay. I can not immagine what react from the students and workers. It is obvious the liberay stop the class. One of the students talked to rudranii and asked about what's going on. 4/26/2024 Anisha and Tusiita hired a handyman to work on the shared driveway. Rudranii saw them and called Hiranyamaya to inform him. He said that nobody should be working on the shared driveway. He also mentioned that Anisha and Tusiita had previously complained about something we placed on the border of the shared driveway. I need to explain something to all HOA members. Issues between Anisha and Tusiita, and us, are not just a private matter between two families. It's a concern for everyone in the community. The law is the law. If Anisha can put something on or work on the shared driveway, and you members think it's not your problem, you'll likely let it go this time. But if something similar happens again in your neighborhood, how would you resolve the problem then? Anisha and Tussita knew the rule but they still charge HOA bottom line again and again. They don't respect that we all agree what we agree. Yama and niyama, social moral would not accept this kind of attitude. Last year, you might have thought this was just an issue between families, so you said it was negative and that we shouldn't discuss it over email. No, any issue involving one of us affects the entire community. I don't understand how someone who's been part of this community for so many years could think otherwise. It's selfish. i had a map put on t roadside map direct my workers go to my house building side. but Anisha took it down and throw it to the ditch. Anisha is playing my mail box and broke the bar on my mail box. When she tried to break it and i found out i tried to put it back to normal. Next day she came and tried to break it. We played this game about three months. she enjoyed playing this game with me. she thought no one knows. At the end of the game, she broke the bar. and i took the bar home. today, i still had the bar. When i mentioned someone vandaling my mailbox, Hiranyamaya sugguested to put a survor. Ramesha and Anisha objected it. Later on when they lost their package, , they agreed to put on a suvoyor. it is so obvious, too me, it's a racism against me. 4/26/2024 Rudranii told Hiranmaya he is favored to Anisha and Tusiita. Hiranyamaya didn't admit it. he said she didn't understand and made a wrong judgement. Actually, it's very true. They are favored Anisha and Tusiita. Give an example this time, when rudranii complaining they are working some construction work on the shared driveway. They did it many times. Hiranyamaya didn't come to check. He attacked her with a saying "They also complaing we put things on the boarder of the shared driveway." At the first zoom meeting, i complained HOA members like to take advantge of us. One reason is Rudranii had a good heart. another reason is they thought i don't know how to speak English. Most of the time, i remained silence and quiet. i won't mind to get revenge in 10 years or 20 years. Just like i did on Vimananda and Shudbamonanda, these two evil dadas. That's why Visha Mitra cheated me on easement, on our land Before we don't have easement on our land. Put the electrical box on my land without discuss it with me and Anisha. i putup a roadmap on the road Anisha removed it and throw it to the ditch. i found out later and put it in my car. Anisha tried to break the handle on my mailbox. She could not break it in once. i found it out. i put the back to the original Next day she came to break it. In this way she play this game until the handle was broken. She stopped. Hiranyamaya suggested to setup a surveyor. Ramesha and Anisha went forward to go against it. Later, when this thing happened to them, then, they agreed Rici to set a surveyor up. See, i'm a Chinese. i was treated in a different way. Do you feel what i feel? A few days ago, I texted Karuna, saying, 'Your mom was bullied by HOA members today.' The reason I sent this message was to teach my son and daughter not to trust margii. To them, Yama and Niyama are just a joke. 打听别人家私事, 不是你们该做的事. They are having the garbage and put wood on the shared driveway, because you peiple are hypocripy, mistake is a mistake should correct it right away, HOA do nothing here. that's why no correction at all. i'm here will wake you guys everyday until you correct your mistake. HOA covenant alrady setup the rule on Shared driveway. Anisha and Tiussita broke the law. They tried to put stepways on the shared driveway last year. I stopped them to do it. The handyman hired by them wanted to hit me and threatened me by using a big shavel while he was faceing me and thrusted the shavel on the ground in front of me when i was talking to him. i said to him You want to hit me, Hit me. He calmed down a little bit. Dared not to hit me. 4/22/2024 Monday Anisha and Tussita did something on the driveway. Rudranii called Hiranyamaya about it. Hitranyamaya said he will come to check it. Nobody allowed to do anything on sharedriveway. The result was Hiranyamaya didn't show up. He may call Anisha and Tussita. They stopped the work. Anisha and Tussita did something against law again and again. They are also an executive on the board. Why? because we don't have a punishment clause on the covenant. We, HOA members should make a law on this kind of behavior. They put gabage on the shared driveway for years. They put the pile wood on the shared driveway for years. They didn't correct it. So We, members of the HOA have to tell them and force them to correct it. Usually, a member do something against HOA covenant or bylaw. They have a fined law to this kind of behavior. Like: You have one month to correct the violation. We fine you 30.00 a day untill you correct it. HOA will send them a legal letter or email to them. HOA has this kind of rights. So let's decide how much a day to fine Anisha and Tussita. They are the executive on board. They should not be the executive.

how to play chess?

Chess Pieces & Their Moves King (♔/♚) – Moves one square in any direction (horizontally, vertically, or diagonally). Check: If the king is under attack, it must be saved. Checkmate: If the king cannot escape attack, the game ends. Castling: A special move where the king moves two squares toward a rook, and the rook jumps over (only if neither has moved and no pieces block them). Queen (♕/♛) – Moves any number of squares horizontally, vertically, or diagonally. Rook (♖/♜) – Moves any number of squares horizontally or vertically. Involved in castling. Bishop (♗/♝) – Moves any number of squares diagonally. Knight (♘/♞) – Moves in an "L" shape (two squares in one direction, then one square perpendicular). Only piece that can jump over others. Pawn (♙/♟) – Moves forward one square, but captures diagonally forward. First move option: Can move two squares forward. En passant: If a pawn moves two squares past an enemy pawn, it can be captured as if it moved only one. Promotion: If a pawn reaches the opposite side, it can become any other piece (usually a queen). Special Rules Check: When a king is under attack, the player must move to stop the threat. Checkmate: When the king is in check with no legal moves to escape—game over. Stalemate: If a player has no legal moves but is not in check, the game is a draw. Draw: Also occurs by threefold repetition, 50-move rule (no captures/pawn moves in 50 moves), or insufficient material (e.g., king vs. king). Game Objective Win by checkmating the opponent’s king. Draw if neither player can win. 当然可以！国际象棋中的 “吃过路兵”（en passant） 是 pawn（兵）的一种特殊走法，中文通常称为 “吃过路兵” 或 “隘路吃兵”。以下是详细解释： Of course! The "en passant" in chess is a special move of the pawn, often referred to in Chinese as "eating a passer" or "passing a soldier". Here's the detailed explanation: 规则说明： Rule Description: 触发条件 Trigger conditions 当一方的兵 从初始位置（第2行或第7行）一步前进两格 时，如果这个兵落在对方相邻的兵的 同一横线（相邻列），对方可以选择用兵“斜吃”它，仿佛它只走了一格。 When a pawn advances two squares from its initial position (row 2 or row 7), if the pawn lands on the same horizontal line (adjacent column) as the opponent's neighboring pawn, the opponent can choose to "eat" it diagonally with the pawn as if it had only gone one square. 例如： For example: 白兵在 e2，黑兵在 f4。 White pawns are at e2 and black pawns are at f4. 白兵从 e2 → e4（前进两格），此时黑方的 f4 兵可以 斜吃到 e3，同时移除白方的 e4 兵。 White moves from e2 → e4 (two squares), at which point Black's f4 pawn can eat diagonally to e3 and remove White's e4 pawn. 执行时机 Timing of execution 必须立刻吃！如果对方不选择在下一步马上“吃过路兵”，之后就不能再吃。 Must eat it right away! If the other party does not choose to "eat the passerby" right away in the next step, they will not be able to eat again. 限制条件 Restrictions 只有兵能“吃过路兵”，其他棋子不行。 Only pawns can "eat passing soldiers", not other pawns. 被吃的兵必须是因为 第一步前进两格 才触发此规则。 The pawn being eaten must be triggered by the first move two squares. 为什么有这个规则？ Why is there such a rule? 历史上，兵最初只能走一格。后来为了加速开局，允许兵第一步走两格，但为了避免兵借此“绕过”敌方兵的威胁，加入了“吃过路兵”规则，保持战术公平性。 Historically, pawns were initially limited to one block. Later, in order to speed up the start, the pawn was allowed to make two squares in the first step, but in order to prevent the pawn from "bypassing" the threat of the enemy pawn, the rule of "eating the passing pawn" was added to maintain tactical fairness. 中文示例： Chinese example: 黑兵在 c4，白兵在 d2。 The black pawn is on c4 and the white pawn is on d2. 白兵从 d2 → d4（前进两格），黑兵可以 从 c4 斜吃到 d3，吃掉白兵（d4 被移除）。 White creeps go from d2 → d4 (two squares forward), and black creeps can eat diagonally from c4 to d3 and eat white creeps (d4 is removed). 简单来说，就是“趁对方的兵走两格时，用相邻的兵斜吃它，就像它只走了一格”。这个规则容易忽略，但对实战很有用！ 😊 To put it simply, "take advantage of the opponent's pawn to move two squares, eat it diagonally with the adjacent pawn, as if it had only gone one square". This rule is easy to ignore, but useful in real combat! 😊 New chat